Kats et al v. Stanford Hospitals & Clinics et al
Filing
7
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REOPEN. The court has considered such document as a motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. As so construed, the Motion is DENIED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/31/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2012) Modified text on 7/31/2012 (ecg, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/31/2012: #1 Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KLAUDIA KATS, ET AL. et al,
Case Number: CV11-06379 EJD
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
STANFORD HOSPITALS & CLINICS, ET
AL. et al,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on July 31, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
August Kats
Edward Kats
Jay Kats
Klaudia Kats
493 W. Charleston Rd.
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Dated: July 31, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
/s/ By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?