Kats et al v. Stanford Hospitals & Clinics et al

Filing 7

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REOPEN. The court has considered such document as a motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. As so construed, the Motion is DENIED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/31/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2012) Modified text on 7/31/2012 (ecg, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/31/2012: #1 Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KLAUDIA KATS, ET AL. et al, Case Number: CV11-06379 EJD Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. STANFORD HOSPITALS & CLINICS, ET AL. et al, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on July 31, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. August Kats Edward Kats Jay Kats Klaudia Kats 493 W. Charleston Rd. Palo Alto, CA 94306 Dated: July 31, 2012 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk /s/ By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?