Creagri, Inc. v. Pinnaclife Inc
Filing
19
Order GRANTING 18 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 5/24/2012. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2012)
Case5:11-cv-06635-LHK Document18-1 Filed05/23/12 Page1 of 2
1 PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
pandre@ kramerlevinv.com
2 LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
lkobialka@ kramerlevin.com
3 HAROLD STOREY (State Bar No. 268603)
hstorey@kramerlevin.com
4 KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
990 Marsh Road
5 Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 752-1700
6 Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8 CREAGRI, INC.
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12 CREAGRI, INC.,
a California Corporation,
13
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant,
14
v.
15
PINNACLIFE INC.,
16 an Nevada Corporation,
17
Case No.: 11-CV-06635 LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Defendant/Counterclaimant.
18
19
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
20
21
The Court, having considered the foregoing, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby
22 ordered that:
23
The initial Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for June 13, 2012, shall be
24 continued to July 25, 2012, at 2:00 p.m.
25
The Parties’ Rule 26(f) Report and Joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be due
26 seven days prior to the rescheduled initial Cases Management Conference.
27
28
1
__________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 11-CV-06635 LHK
Case5:11-cv-06635-LHK Document18-1 Filed05/23/12 Page2 of 2
1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
2
3
May 24, 2012
4 Dated: _______________________
5
6
By: _______________________
HONORABLE LUCY KOH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
__________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 11-CV-06635 LHK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?