Creagri, Inc. v. Pinnaclife Inc

Filing 19

Order GRANTING 18 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 5/24/2012. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2012)

Download PDF
Case5:11-cv-06635-LHK Document18-1 Filed05/23/12 Page1 of 2 1 PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585) pandre@ kramerlevinv.com 2 LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404) lkobialka@ kramerlevin.com 3 HAROLD STOREY (State Bar No. 268603) hstorey@kramerlevin.com 4 KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP 990 Marsh Road 5 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 752-1700 6 Facsimile: (650) 752-1800 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 CREAGRI, INC. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 CREAGRI, INC., a California Corporation, 13 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, 14 v. 15 PINNACLIFE INC., 16 an Nevada Corporation, 17 Case No.: 11-CV-06635 LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendant/Counterclaimant. 18 19 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 20 21 The Court, having considered the foregoing, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby 22 ordered that: 23 The initial Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for June 13, 2012, shall be 24 continued to July 25, 2012, at 2:00 p.m. 25 The Parties’ Rule 26(f) Report and Joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be due 26 seven days prior to the rescheduled initial Cases Management Conference. 27 28 1 __________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 11-CV-06635 LHK Case5:11-cv-06635-LHK Document18-1 Filed05/23/12 Page2 of 2 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 2 3 May 24, 2012 4 Dated: _______________________ 5 6 By: _______________________ HONORABLE LUCY KOH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 __________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 11-CV-06635 LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?