Harris et al v. CBS Corporation et al
Filing
153
ORDER RE: 128 MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS. The court finds that it is appropriately treated as an administrative motion rather than as a noticed motion. Plaintiffs shall file any opposition or notice of non-opposition to the administrative motion on or before 12/28/2012 at which time it will be deemed submitted for decision. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/20/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00049 EJD
WILLIAM L HARRIS, et. al.,
11
ORDER RE: MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE
LIMITS
Plaintiff(s),
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
v.
CBS CORPORATION, et. al.,
[Docket Item No(s). 128]
14
Defendant(s).
15
16
/
On December 18, 2012, Defendant filed a Motion to Exceed Page Limits in Support of its
17
Motion for Summary Judgment, and noticed such motion for hearing on January 7, 2012. See
18
Docket Item No. 128. Having conducted a preliminary review of the motion, the court finds that it
19
is appropriately treated as an administrative motion under Civil Local Rule 7-11 rather than as a
20
noticed motion.
21
In light of this determination and the upcoming holiday, Plaintiffs shall file any opposition or
22
notice of non-opposition to the administrative motion on or before December 28, 2012, at which
23
time it will be deemed submitted for decision.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated: December 20, 2012
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
27
28
1
Case No. 5:12-cv-00049 EJD
ORDER RE: MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?