Harris et al v. CBS Corporation et al

Filing 153

ORDER RE: 128 MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS. The court finds that it is appropriately treated as an administrative motion rather than as a noticed motion. Plaintiffs shall file any opposition or notice of non-opposition to the administrative motion on or before 12/28/2012 at which time it will be deemed submitted for decision. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/20/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00049 EJD WILLIAM L HARRIS, et. al., 11 ORDER RE: MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS Plaintiff(s), For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 v. CBS CORPORATION, et. al., [Docket Item No(s). 128] 14 Defendant(s). 15 16 / On December 18, 2012, Defendant filed a Motion to Exceed Page Limits in Support of its 17 Motion for Summary Judgment, and noticed such motion for hearing on January 7, 2012. See 18 Docket Item No. 128. Having conducted a preliminary review of the motion, the court finds that it 19 is appropriately treated as an administrative motion under Civil Local Rule 7-11 rather than as a 20 noticed motion. 21 In light of this determination and the upcoming holiday, Plaintiffs shall file any opposition or 22 notice of non-opposition to the administrative motion on or before December 28, 2012, at which 23 time it will be deemed submitted for decision. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: December 20, 2012 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 27 28 1 Case No. 5:12-cv-00049 EJD ORDER RE: MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?