David v. Knipp-Cate
Filing
6
INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CLERK. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/23/12. (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
DAVID M. DAVID,
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
v.
UNKNOWN,
13
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 12-0062 LHK (PR)
INSTRUCTIONS TO THE
CLERK
14
15
On January 12, 2012, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a Rule 60(b)(3) motion. In his
16
motion, he requested that the motion be filed in his previously closed case, David v. Reno, No.
17
95-4388 TEH, as a motion to reconsider. It appears this motion to reconsider is erroneously filed
18
in the wrong action. Thus, the Clerk shall file Plaintiff’s Rule 60(b)(3) motion (docket no. 5) in
19
David v. Reno, No. 95-4388 TEH, and strike it from the underlying case of David v. Unknown,
20
No. 12-0062 LHK.
21
22
Dated:
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1/23/12
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
Instructions to the Clerk
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.12\David062instru.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?