Laurencot v. Lockheed Martin Space Operations Company
Filing
18
ORDER VACATING ANTICIPATED HEARING. For a hearing date of 7/27/2012, Rule 7-2 required Plaintiff to file and serve the Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint no later than 6/22/2012, if not forthwith as the court ordered. Plaintiff did not do so. Accordingly, the anticipated hearing on Plaintiffs Motion, previously scheduled for 7/27/2012 is VACATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/28/2012.(ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2012) Modified on 6/28/2012 (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF).
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00202 EJD
ANDRE LAURENCOT,
8
ORDER VACATING ANTICIPATED
HEARING
Plaintiff(s),
9
LOCKHEED MARTIN SPACE
OPERATIONS COMPANY,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
v.
12
Defendant(s).
/
13
14
On June 14, 2012, the court granted Plaintiff’s ex parte application to advance the hearing
15
date on an anticipated Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint. See Docket Item No. 17.
16
The court scheduled the advanced hearing for July 27, 2012, and directed Plaintiff to “notice the
17
motion accordingly and file it as a separate docket entry on PACER/ECF fortwith.”
18
Civil Local Rule 7-2 requires that “all motions must be filed, served and noticed in writing
19
on the motion calendar of the assigned Judge for hearing not less than 35 days after service of the
20
motion.” For a hearing date of July 27, 2012, Rule 7-2 required Plaintiff to file and serve the
21
Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint no later than June 22, 2012, if not forthwith as
22
the court ordered. Plaintiff did not do so.
23
Accordingly, the anticipated hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion, previously scheduled for July 27,
24
2012, is VACATED.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: June 28, 2012
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00202 EJD
ORDER VACATING ANTICIPATED HEARING
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
