Zangrillo v. Gardi

Filing 26

ORDER 23 Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Enlarge Time to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. The Hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is Continued to 3/30/2012 9:00 AM. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/6/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2012)

1
2
3
4

John F. Cove, Jr. (SBN 212213)
Perry Grossman (SBN 260570)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8

Bruce A. Weil (FL State Bar No. 816469)
Lawrence V. Ashe (FL state Bar No. 932280)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
100 S. E. 2ND Street, Suite 2800
Miami, FL 33131-2144
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
To Appear Pro Hac Vice

9

Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Zangrillo

5
6
7

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

ROBERT ZANGRILLO,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Plaintiff,
vs.
PAUL GARDI,
Defendant.

Case No.: 12-cv-00217-RMW
[] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
ENLARGE TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO
DISMISS
[Filed concurrently with Motion to
Enlarge Time to File Opposition to
Motion to Dismiss and Declaration of
Perry M. Grossman in Support of Motion
to Enlarge Time to File Opposition to
Motion to Dismiss.]
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:

None
None
None
Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

23
24
25
26
27
28
[] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS.
CASE NO. 12-CV-00217-RMW

[] ORDER

1

Plaintiff’s Motion to Enlarge Time to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss is HEREBY

2

GRANTED. It is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff have until and including March 13, 2012 to

3

file an opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss; Defendant have until and including March 20,

4

2012 to file a reply; and the hearing on the motion to dismiss be continued until March 30, 2012.

5
6
7

DATED:____________________

_________________________________
HON. RONALD M. WHYTE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS.
CASE NO. 12-CV-00217-RMW