Smith et al v. Intuit, Inc.

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR Defendant Intuit Inc. to Respond to Complaint re 22 Stipulation filed by Intuit, Inc. Response due 3/19/2012. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/8/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2012)

Download PDF
8 9 13 14 15 d w a rd J u d ge E ER J . D av i l H 12 RT 11 SARAH BROWN HADJIMARKOS, SBN 222206 shadjimarkos@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1881 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1211 Telephone: 650.849.5300 Facsimile: 650.849.5333 SHadjimarkos@gibsondunn.com DERED O OR IT IS S NO 10 RT U O 7 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 6 AUSTIN SCHWING, SBN 211696 aschwing@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105-2933 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 ASchwing@gibsondunn.com a FO 5 LI 4 A 3 S 2 MARK A. PERRY, SBN 212532 mperry@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 11101 Telephone: 202.955.8500 Facsimile: 202.467.0539 MPerry@gibsondunn.com UNIT ED 1 N D IS T IC T R OF C 2/8/2012 Attorneys for Defendant INTUIT INC. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN JOSE DIVISION 19 TASHA SMITH and FREDIERICK SMITH, 20 21 Plaintiffs, v. 22 INTUIT INC., a Delaware corp., 23 Defendant. 24 25 Case No. 5:12-CV-00222 EJD STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT INTUIT INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Jury Trial Demanded Date Action Filed: Jan. 13, 2012 Trial Date: Not Set Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, Defendant Intuit Inc. (“Intuit”) and Plaintiffs Tasha Smith 26 and Fredierick Smith (“Plaintiffs”) hereby stipulate to extend the time Intuit has to answer or 27 otherwise respond to the Complaint to Monday, March 19, 2012. 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 12-CV-00222 EJD 1 Dated: February 7, 2012 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 2 3 By: /s/ Austin Schwing Mark A. Perry Austin Schwing Sarah Brown Hadjimarkos 4 5 Attorneys for Defendant INTUIT INC. 6 7 8 Dated: February 7, 2012 9 CARNEY WILLIAMS BATES PULLIAM & BOWMAN, PLLC 10 11 By: /s/ Joseph Henry Bates Joseph Henry Bates 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs TASHA SMITH and FREDIERICK SMITH 13 14 ATTORNEY ATTESTATION 15 16 Pursuant to General Order 45, I, Austin Schwing, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing 17 of this document has been obtained from Joseph Henry Bates. 18 DATED: February 7, 2012 19 By: /s/ Austin Schwing Austin Schwing 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 2 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 12-CV-00222 EJD 1 DECLARATION OF SERVICE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I, Robin McBain, declare as follows: I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to this action; my business address is 555 Mission St., Ste. 3000, San Francisco, California 94105, in said County and State. On February 7, 2012, I served the within: ** STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR INTUIT INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT to all counsel of record as listed below, as follows:  BY ECF (ELECTRONIC CASE FILING): I e-filed the above-detailed documents utilizing the United States District Court, Northern District of California’s mandated ECF (Electronic Case Filing) service on February 7, 2012. Counsel of record are required by the Court to be registered e-filers, and as such are automatically e-served with a copy of the documents upon confirmation of efiling.  BY MAIL: I placed a true copy in a sealed envelope addressed as indicated above, on the date shown below. I am familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Tasha Smith and Fredierick Smith VIA U.S. MAIL VIA U.S. MAIL Joseph Henry Bates Brian T Ku CARNEY WILLIAMS BATES PULLIAM M. Ryan Casey & BOWMAN, PLLC KU AND MUSSMAN, PA 11311 Arcade Drive 12550 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 200 Suite 406 Little Rock, AR 72212 Miami, FL 33181 Ph: (501) 312-8500 Ph: (305) 891-1322 VIA U.S. MAIL VIA U.S. MAIL Isaac Miller MILSTEIN ADELMAN LLP 2800 Donald Douglas Loop North Santa Monica, CA 90405 Ph: (310) 396-9600 Kenneth J. Grunfeld Richard M. Golomb Ruben Honik GOLOMB AND HONIK, PC 1515 Market Street Suite 1100 Philadelphia, PA 19102 Ph: (215) 985-9177 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP DECLARATION OF SERVICE – CASE NO. 12-CV-00222 EJD 1 2 3 4 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this Declaration of Service was executed by me on February 7, 2012, at San Francisco, California. By /s/Robin McBain Robin McBain 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP DECLARATION OF SERVICE – CASE NO. 12-CV-00222 EJD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?