Freeza et al v. Google, Inc.

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER #19 Changing Time, Set/Reset Deadlines as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion Hearing set for 6/15/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 5/23/12. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Edward D. Johnson (SBN 189475)
[e-mail]
Eric B. Evans (SBN 232476)
[e-mail]
Jonathan A. Helfgott (SBN 278969)
[e-mail]
MAYER BROWN LLP
Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9

Attorneys for Defendant
Google Inc.

10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15

RACHEL FREZZA and MAURO
RODRIGUEZ, on their own behalf and all
others similarly situated,

16
17
18

Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00237-RMW
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
CHANGING TIME
Date Filed: January 13, 2012
Trial Date:
Not Set

v.
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME
CASE NO. 5:12-CV-00237-RMW

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), this stipulation is entered into between Counsel for

2

Plaintiffs Rachel Frezza and Mauro Rodriguez (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Google

3

Inc. (“Google”).

4
5
6

WHEREAS, on May 8, 2012, the Court set the hearing on Google’s Motion to Dismiss
for June 8, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the Court’s May 8 notice setting the June 8 hearing date,

7

Plaintiffs became aware of a conflict that will make them unavailable on that date, and requested

8

that Google agree to have the hearing set for another date;

9
10
11

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the parties jointly request that the
hearing on Google’s Motion to Dismiss be adjourned until June 15, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the parties jointly request any case

12

management conference in this matter shall be adjourned so that it does not take place prior to

13

the hearing on Google’s Motion to Dismiss.

14

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a)(2), the parties state that on February 2, 2012,

15

Plaintiffs agreed to extend Google’s time to respond to the Complaint to March 16, 2012; on

16

March 20, 2012, and on March 29, 2012 Google agreed to extend Plaintiffs’ time to file their

17

opposition until April 20, 2012 and the parties stipulated that Google would have until May 4,

18

2012 to file its reply.

19
20
21

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: May 10, 2012

MAYER BROWN LLP

22

/s/Edward D. Johnson
Edward D. Johnson
Eric B. Evans
Jonathan A. Helfgott
Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc.

23
24
25
26
27
28

1
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME
CASE NO. 5:12-CV-00237-RMW

1

ATKINS & DAVIDSON, APC

2
/s/ Todd C. Atkins
Todd. C. Atkins
701 B Street, Suite 1170
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

3
4
5
6

-AND7

11

SIPRUT PC
Joseph J. Siprut
James M. McClintick
122 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 1850
Chicago, IL 60603
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

12

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

8
9
10

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME
CASE NO. 5:12-CV-00237-RMW

1
2
3

[] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT:

4

(1) The hearing on Defendant Google Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss shall be set for Friday, June 15,
2012 at 9:00 a.m.

5

(2) No case management conference shall occur before Friday, June 15, 2012.

6
7
8

DATED:

___________________________________
HON. RONALD M. WHYTE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME
CASE NO. 5:12-CV-00237-RMW