Freeza et al v. Google, Inc.

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER 19 Changing Time, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 7 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion Hearing set for 6/15/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 5/23/12. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Edward D. Johnson (SBN 189475) wjohnson@mayerbrown.com Eric B. Evans (SBN 232476) eevans@mayerbrown.com Jonathan A. Helfgott (SBN 278969) jhelfgott@mayerbrown.com MAYER BROWN LLP Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 Telephone: (650) 331-2000 Facsimile: (650) 331-2060 8 9 Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 RACHEL FREZZA and MAURO RODRIGUEZ, on their own behalf and all others similarly situated, 16 17 18 Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00237-RMW STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME Date Filed: January 13, 2012 Trial Date: Not Set v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME CASE NO. 5:12-CV-00237-RMW 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), this stipulation is entered into between Counsel for 2 Plaintiffs Rachel Frezza and Mauro Rodriguez (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Google 3 Inc. (“Google”). 4 5 6 WHEREAS, on May 8, 2012, the Court set the hearing on Google’s Motion to Dismiss for June 8, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the Court’s May 8 notice setting the June 8 hearing date, 7 Plaintiffs became aware of a conflict that will make them unavailable on that date, and requested 8 that Google agree to have the hearing set for another date; 9 10 11 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the parties jointly request that the hearing on Google’s Motion to Dismiss be adjourned until June 15, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the parties jointly request any case 12 management conference in this matter shall be adjourned so that it does not take place prior to 13 the hearing on Google’s Motion to Dismiss. 14 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a)(2), the parties state that on February 2, 2012, 15 Plaintiffs agreed to extend Google’s time to respond to the Complaint to March 16, 2012; on 16 March 20, 2012, and on March 29, 2012 Google agreed to extend Plaintiffs’ time to file their 17 opposition until April 20, 2012 and the parties stipulated that Google would have until May 4, 18 2012 to file its reply. 19 20 21 IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: May 10, 2012 MAYER BROWN LLP 22 /s/Edward D. Johnson Edward D. Johnson Eric B. Evans Jonathan A. Helfgott Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306 Telephone: (650) 331-2000 Facsimile: (650) 331-2060 Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc. 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME CASE NO. 5:12-CV-00237-RMW 1 ATKINS & DAVIDSON, APC 2 /s/ Todd C. Atkins Todd. C. Atkins 701 B Street, Suite 1170 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 255-2380 Fax: (619) 231-4984 3 4 5 6 -AND7 11 SIPRUT PC Joseph J. Siprut James M. McClintick 122 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 1850 Chicago, IL 60603 Telephone: (312) 588-1440 Fax: (312) 427-1850 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME CASE NO. 5:12-CV-00237-RMW 1 2 3 [] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT: 4 (1) The hearing on Defendant Google Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss shall be set for Friday, June 15, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. 5 (2) No case management conference shall occur before Friday, June 15, 2012. 6 7 8 DATED: ___________________________________ HON. RONALD M. WHYTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME CASE NO. 5:12-CV-00237-RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?