Villa v. United Site Services of California, Inc

Filing 37

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 36 Stipulation (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2012)

Case5:12-cv-00318-LHK Document36 Filed07/20/12 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4

Susan E. Bishop (SBN 187253)
PRATT & ASSOCIATES
The Pruneyard Tower I
1901 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 350
Campbell, CA 95008
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
6

Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED SITE SERVICES
OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

7

THE PRUNEYARD TOWER I
1901 S. BASCOM AVENUE, SUITE 350
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE [phone]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

Pratt & Associates

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12

NELSON GONZALEZ VILLA, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,

Case No. CV 12-00318 LHK

13

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO MOTION FOR
CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION

Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
16

UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA,
INC.;

17

Defendant.

18
19
20

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

21

Plaintiff Nelson Gonzalez Villa ("Plaintiff") and defendant United Site Services of

22

California, Inc. ("Defendant") through their undersigned attorneys, stipulate and respectfully

23

request that this Court approve an extension of time for Defendant to file an opposition to the

24

motion for conditional certification filed on July 10, 2012. As grounds for this extension of time,

25

the parties hereto state as follows:

26
27

1.

The hearing on the motion has been scheduled for November 8, 2012. Counsel for

Defendant has only started its preliminary analysis of the potential class.

28
-1STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Plaintiff graciously

Case5:12-cv-00318-LHK Document36 Filed07/20/12 Page2 of 3

1

granted an extension of time, until August 20, 2012, for defendant to submit its opposition.

2

Plaintiff’s reply brief would be filed by August 27, 2012.

3

2.

There have been no other time modifications in this case.

4

3.

The parties believe this time modification will have no impact on the schedule for

5

this case given its early stage and given that the hearing date will remain the same.

6

NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the foregoing, the parties, through their undersigned

7

attorneys, stipulate to extend the time to file and serve an opposition to the motion for conditional

8

class certification to August 20, 2012 and the reply to August 27, 2012.

THE PRUNEYARD TOWER I
1901 S. BASCOM AVENUE, SUITE 350
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE [phone]

Pratt & Associates

9

IT IS SO STIPULATED between the parties.

10
11

Dated: July 19, 2012

PRATT & ASSOCIATES
By:____/s/ Susan E. Bishop_____
Susan E. Bishop
Attorneys for Defendant UNITED SITE
SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

12
13
14
15

Dated: July 19, 2012

LAW OFFICES OF MITCH ALLEN

16

By:_____/s/ Mitch Allen_______
Mitch Allen
Attorneys for Plaintiff
NELSON GONZALEZ VILLA

17
18
19

ECF ATTESTATION

20

I, Susan E. Bishop, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file the

21

following: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO

22

MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I

23

hereby attest that Mitch Allen has concurred in this filing.

24

Dated: July 19, 2012

PRATT & ASSOCIATES

25

By:____/s/ Susan E. Bishop_____
Susan E. Bishop
Attorneys for Defendant UNITED SITE
SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

26
27
28
-2-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Case5:12-cv-00318-LHK Document36 Filed07/20/12 Page3 of 3

1
2

ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

July 23
Dated: ____________, 2012

__________________________________
United States District Court

5
6
7
8

THE PRUNEYARD TOWER I
1901 S. BASCOM AVENUE, SUITE 350
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE [phone]

Pratt & Associates

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER