Brown v. Hedgpath
Filing
18
ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 17 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
TIMOTHY WILLIAM BROWN,
Case No. C 12-0362 RMW (PR)
Petitioner, [] ORDER
v.
ANTHONY HEDGPATH, Warden,
Respondent.
17
18
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that respondent may have until October
19
11, 2013 to file an answer to, or responsive motion regarding, the petition for writ of habeas
20
corpus. Petitioner may file and serve a traverse, if any, within thirty (30) days of his receipt of
21
the answer. He may file and serve an opposition or statement of non-opposition within thirty (30)
22
days of his receipt of a motion to dismiss, if any, and respondent may file with the Court and
23
serve on petitioner a reply within fifteen (15) days of the date any opposition is filed.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated: ___________________________
__________________________
The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
27
28
1
[] Order, Enlargement of Time, Brown v. Hedgpath (C 12-0362 RMW (PR))
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TIMOTHY WILLIAM BROWN,
Case Number: CV12-00362 RMW
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
ANTHONY HEDGPATH et al,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on August 28, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Timothy William Brown G-38339
Salinas Valley State Prison
A4-129-L
P.O. Box 1050
Soledad, CA 93960-1050
Dated: August 28, 2013
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?