Brown v. Hedgpath

Filing 25

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 22 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMOTHY WILLIAM BROWN, Case No. C 12-0362 RMW (PR) 12 Petitioner, [] ORDER 13 14 15 16 v. ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, Respondent. 17 18 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that respondent shall file an answer or 19 dispositive motion no later than February 10, 2014 to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. 20 Petitioner may file and serve a traverse, if any, within thirty (30) days after an answer is filed. 21 He may file and serve an opposition or statement of non-opposition within thirty (30) days of 22 filing a motion to dismiss, if any, and respondent may file with the Court and serve on petitioner a 23 reply within fourteen (14) days of the date any opposition is filed. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: ___________________________ __________________________ The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 27 28 1 [] Order, 3rd Enlargement of Time, Brown v. Hedgpeth (C 12-0362 RMW (PR)) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TIMOTHY WILLIAM BROWN, Case Number: CV12-00362 RMW Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. ANTHONY HEDGPATH et al, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on February 3, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Timothy William Brown G-38339 Salinas Valley State Prison A4-129-L P.O. Box 1050 Soledad, CA 93960-1050 Dated: February 3, 2014 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?