Brown v. Hedgpath
Filing
25
ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 22 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TIMOTHY WILLIAM BROWN,
Case No. C 12-0362 RMW (PR)
12
Petitioner, [] ORDER
13
14
15
16
v.
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden,
Respondent.
17
18
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that respondent shall file an answer or
19
dispositive motion no later than February 10, 2014 to the petition for writ of habeas corpus.
20
Petitioner may file and serve a traverse, if any, within thirty (30) days after an answer is filed.
21
He may file and serve an opposition or statement of non-opposition within thirty (30) days of
22
filing a motion to dismiss, if any, and respondent may file with the Court and serve on petitioner a
23
reply within fourteen (14) days of the date any opposition is filed.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated: ___________________________
__________________________
The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
27
28
1
[] Order, 3rd Enlargement of Time, Brown v. Hedgpeth (C 12-0362 RMW (PR))
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TIMOTHY WILLIAM BROWN,
Case Number: CV12-00362 RMW
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
ANTHONY HEDGPATH et al,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on February 3, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Timothy William Brown G-38339
Salinas Valley State Prison
A4-129-L
P.O. Box 1050
Soledad, CA 93960-1050
Dated: February 3, 2014
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?