Elias v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 61

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 60 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 59 Discovery Dispute Joint Report #2. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/16/2014. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2014)

Download PDF
*E-Filed: May 16, 2014* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP ADAM J. GUTRIDE (State Bar No. 181446) SETH A. SAFIER (State Bar No. 197427) TODD KENNEDY (State Bar No. 250267) KRISTEN SIMPLICIO (State Bar No. 263291) 835 Douglass Street San Francisco, California 94114 Telephone: (415) 336-6545 Facsimile: (415) 449-6469 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNA 10 11 12 13 DAVID ELIAS, an individual, on behalf of himself, the general public and those similarly situated 15 16 17 STIPULATION REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE JOINT REPORT No. 2 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiff, 14 CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00421 v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 50 Defendants 18 19 WHEREAS, on May 7, 2014, Plaintiff and Defendant Hewlett Packard Company (“HP”) 20 filed a Discovery Dispute Joint Report #2 (the “Joint Report”), concerning the scheduling of the 21 parties’ respective depositions and the inspection of Plaintiff’s Pavilion s5305z desktop computer 22 [Dkt. #59]; 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, following the filing of the Joint Report, the parties continued to meet and confer regarding the disputed matters set forth in the Joint Report; WHEREAS, through these further meet-and-confer efforts, the parties have agreed to a schedule for the completion of the outstanding depositions and computer inspection; WHEREAS, the parties desire to resolve the matters set forth in the Joint Report by setting forth a stipulated schedule to be approved by the Court; 1 STIPULATION REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE JOINT REPORT NO. 2 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the outstanding depositions and computer inspection will proceed according to the following schedule, subject to the Court’s approval, thereby fully resolving the issues set forth in the Joint Report: 5 Event Date 6 Inspection of Plaintiff’s s5305z Desktop Computer May 28, 2014 Deposition of Girish Srinivasan, HP’s Rule 30(b)(6) Designee on Topics Pertaining to Sales and Marketing June 6, 2014 Depositions of Plaintiff David Elias, and Plaintiff’s wife, Kenia Elias June 12, 2014 Deposition of Karl Hassur, HP’s Rule 30(b)(6) Designee on Topics Pertaining to Technology June 13, 20141 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Dated: May 15, 2014 /s/ Seth A. Safier Seth A. Safier GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP 835 Douglass Street San Francisco, California 94114 Attorneys for Plaintiff, David Elias 14 15 16 17 18 Dated: May 15, 2014 /s/ Timothy W. Loose Timothy W. Loose Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 333 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90071 Attorneys for Defendant, Hewlett-Packard Company 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Mr. Hassur currently is scheduled for jury duty from June 2–6. Should Mr. Hassur be selected to serve on a trial that is continuing at the time of his currently scheduled deposition, the parties agree to promptly find an alternative and mutually agreeable date for the deposition to occur. 2 STIPULATION REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE JOINT REPORT NO. 2 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 4 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, the issues set forth in Discovery Dispute Joint Report No. 2 are resolved and the outstanding discovery shall proceed according to the following schedule: 5 Event Date 6 Inspection of Plaintiff’s s5305z Desktop Computer May 28, 2014 Deposition of Girish Srinivasan, HP’s Rule 30(b)(6) Designee on Topics Pertaining to Sales and Marketing June 6, 2014 Depositions of Plaintiff David Elias, and Plaintiff’s wife, Kenia Elias June 12, 2014 Deposition of Karl Hassur, HP’s Rule 30(b)(6) Designee on Topics Pertaining to Technology June 13, 20142 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 DATED: May 16, 2014 THE HONORABLE HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Mr. Hassur currently is scheduled for jury duty from June 2–6. Should Mr. Hassur be selected to serve on a trial that is continuing at the time of his currently scheduled deposition, the parties agree to promptly find an alternative and mutually agreeable date for the deposition to occur. 3 STIPULATION REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE JOINT REPORT NO. 2 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?