GLT Technovations, LLC v. Fownes Brothers & Co, Incorporated
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER 22 Continuing Hearing and Briefing Schedule for Defendant's Pending Motion to Dismiss, Transfer Venue and/or Stay Action. Motion Hearing set for 4/20/2012 9:00 AM before Judge Ronald M. Whyte. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/19/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2012)
1 PAUL ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
pandre@kramerlevin.com
2 LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
3
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
4 990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
5 Telephone: (650) 752-1700
Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
6
ROBERT MORRIS (admitted pro hac vice)
7
rmorris@kramerlevin.com
8 KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
1177 Avenue of the Americas
9 New York, NY 10036
Telephone: (212) 715-9100
10 Facsimile: (212) 715-8000
11
Attorneys for Defendant
12 FOWNES BROTHERS & CO., INCORPORATED
13
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN JOSE DIVISION
16 GLT TECHNOVATIONS, LLC, a Nevada
17 limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
18
v.
19
20
21
22
FOWNES BROTHERS & CO.,
INCORPORATED, a New York corporation,
Defendant.
Case No.: CV 12-00466-RMW
STIPULATION AND []
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANT’S PENDING MOTION TO
DISMISS, TRANSFER VENUE AND/OR
STAY ACTION
New Hearing Date: April 20, 2012
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Judge: Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
Courtroom 6, 4th Floor
23
24
25
26
27
28
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION & [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME
CASE NO. 12-CV-00466-RMW
TO DISMISS, TRANSFER VENUE
1
2
3
4
5
6
Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1 and 6.2, the parties, Defendant Fownes Brothers & Co.,
Incorporated (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff’s GLT Technovations, LLC (“Plaintiff”), hereby stipulate as
follows:
WHEREAS, on February 28, 2012, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay this
action (“Motion to Dismiss”), which was previously scheduled to be heard on April 3, 2012 before The
Honorable Magistrate Howard R. Lloyd;
7
8
9
WHEREAS, on March 8, 2012, this case was reassigning to The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte;
WHEREAS, the Parties met and conferred regarding the schedule and to accommodate the
10 parties’ respective schedules, the Parties have agreed to the following:
11
(a) to reschedule the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss to Friday, April 20, 2012 at
12 9:00 a.m.;
13
14
(b) Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, previously due on March 13, 2012,
is extended and now due no later than March 30, 2012; and
15
16
(c) Defendant’s reply to Plaintiff’s opposition will be due no later than April 6, 2012.
17
WHEREAS, this stipulation will not have any effect on the schedule for the case.
18
WHEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that the hearing on Defendant’s Motion
19 to Dismiss is Friday, April 20, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6. Plaintiff’s opposition will be due by
20 March 30, 2012, and Defendant’s reply will be due by April 6, 2012.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
28 __________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION & [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME
CASE NO. 12-CV-00466-RMW
TO DISMISS, TRANSFER VENUE
1
2
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: March 12, 2012
3
By: /s/ Lisa Kobialka
Lisa Kobialka
Paul Andre (State Bar. No. 196585)
Lisa Kobialka (State Bar No. 191404)
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 752-1700
Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
4
5
6
7
8
Robert Morris (admitted pro hac vice)
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Telephone: (212) 715-9100
Facsimile: (212) 715-8000
9
10
11
12
Attorneys for Defendant,
FOWNES BROTHERS & CO., INCORPORATED
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
DATED: March 12, 2012
By: /s/ Kimberly Fahrenbrook Rich
Kimberly Fahrenbrook Rich
Irene V. Gutierrez
BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP
Two Embarcadero, 11th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3802
Telephone: (415) 576-3099
Facsimile: (415) 576-3099
Kimberly Fahrenbrook Rich (admitted pro hac vice)
BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP
2300 Trammell Crow Center
2001 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 75201
Telephone: (214) 978-3051
Facsimile: (214) 978-3099
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
GLT TECHNOVATIONS LLC
26
27
2
28 __________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION & [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME
CASE NO. 12-CV-00466-RMW
TO DISMISS, TRANSFER VENUE
1
2
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, Transfer Venue, and/or Stay is set for April 20, 2012 with Plaintiff’s
3
Opposition due March 30, 2012 and Defendant’s Reply due April 6, 2012.
ER
R NIA
. Whyte
FO
onald M
LI
Judge R
A
H
9
RT
8
NO
7
_________________________________
Honorable PPROVEDM. Whyte
Ronald
A
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
UNIT
ED
6
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
5 Dated: ______________________, 2012
S
4
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
3
28 __________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION & [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME
CASE NO. 12-CV-00466-RMW
TO DISMISS, TRANSFER VENUE
1
GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION
2
I, LISA KOBIALKA, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time for Motion to Dismiss, Transfer Venue and/or Stay
3
Action. In compliance with General Order 45, I hereby attest that Kimberly F. Rich, Lead Counsel for
4 Plaintiff, have concurred with this filing. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct.
5
6 Dated: March 12, 2012
7
8
9
10
By: /s/ Lisa Kobialka
Lisa Kobialka
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
& FRANKEL LLP
Attorneys for Defendant,
FOWNES BROTHERS & CO.,
INCORPORATED
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
4
28 __________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION & [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME
CASE NO. 12-CV-00466-RMW
TO DISMISS, TRANSFER VENUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?