Zorio v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al
Filing
49
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 45 Stipulation (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2012)
Case5:12-cv-00498-LHK Document45 Filed06/01/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
Amanda E. Glowacki, Esq. (IN #29972-21)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: 317-363-2400
Fax: 317-363-2257
E-Mail: aglowacki@schuckitlaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
7
8
12
Michael W. Bien, Esq. (CSB #96891)
Sumana Cooppan, Esq. (CSB # 267967)
Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP
315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-433-6830
Fax: 415-433-7104
E-Mail: mbien@rbg-law.com
scooppan@rbg-law.com
13
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
9
10
11
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN JOSE DIVISION
18
19
TIMOTHY ZORIO, an individual,
Plaintiff,
20
vs.
21
22
23
24
25
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.;
TRANS UNION, L.L.C.; EQUIFAX
INFORMATION SERVICES, L.L.C.; CHASE
HOME LENDING a subsidiary of JP MORGAN
CHASE, N.A.; SETER US, INC., formerly known
as IBM LENDER BUSINESS PROCESS
SERVICES, INC.;
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00498-LHK
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION,
LLC ONLY
26
27
28
Plaintiff Timothy Zorio, by counsel, and Defendant Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”),
by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein between them have been
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 5:12-CV-00498-LHK
Page 1 of 3
Case5:12-cv-00498-LHK Document45 Filed06/01/12 Page2 of 3
1
compromised and settled, and that Plaintiff’s cause against Trans Union only should be
2
dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
Respectfully submitted,
3
4
5
Date:
5/31/2012
6
7
8
9
10
s/ Anita L. Steburg (w/consent)
Anita L. Steburg, Esq.
Steburg Law Firm
1798 Technology Drive, Suite 258
San Jose, CA 95110
Telephone: 408-573-1122
Fax: 408-573-1126
E-mail: anita@steburglawfirm.com
Counsel for Timothy Zorio
11
12
13
18
s/ Amanda E. Glowacki
Amanda E. Glowacki, Esq. (IN #29972-21)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: 317-363-2400
Fax: 317-363-2257
E-Mail: aglowacki@schuckitlaw.com
19
Lead Counsel for Trans Union, LLC
14
15
16
17
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Date: June 1, 2012
Michael W. Bien, Esq. (CSB #96891)
Sumana Cooppan, Esq. (CSB #267967)
Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP
315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-433-6830
Fax: 415-433-7104
E-Mail: mbien@rbg-law.com
scooppan@rbg-law.com
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union,
LLC
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 5:12-CV-00498-LHK
Page 2 of 3
Case5:12-cv-00498-LHK Document45 Filed06/01/12 Page3 of 3
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Trans Union, LLC is
2
dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff Timothy Zorio and Defendant Trans Union, LLC shall each
3
bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.
4
5
6
June 11, 2012
Date: ________________________
7
____________________________________
JUDGE, United States District Court, Northern
District of California
8
9
10
11
12
13
DISTRIBUTION TO:
Anita Louise Steburg, Esq.
anita@steburglawfirm.com
Michael Robert McLively, Esq.
mrmclively@jonesday.com
David Owens, Esq.
owensd2@bryancave.com
Timothy Matthew Ryan, Esq.
ecf@theryanfirm.com
Sumana Cooppan, Esq.
scooppan@rbg-law.com
Amanda E. Glowacki, Esq.
aglowacki@schuckitlaw.com
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 5:12-CV-00498-LHK
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?