Zorio v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al

Filing 49

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 45 Stipulation (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2012)

Download PDF
Case5:12-cv-00498-LHK Document45 Filed06/01/12 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 Amanda E. Glowacki, Esq. (IN #29972-21) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Schuckit & Associates, P.C. 4545 Northwestern Drive Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: 317-363-2400 Fax: 317-363-2257 E-Mail: aglowacki@schuckitlaw.com Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 7 8 12 Michael W. Bien, Esq. (CSB #96891) Sumana Cooppan, Esq. (CSB # 267967) Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-433-6830 Fax: 415-433-7104 E-Mail: mbien@rbg-law.com scooppan@rbg-law.com 13 Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 9 10 11 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN JOSE DIVISION 18 19 TIMOTHY ZORIO, an individual, Plaintiff, 20 vs. 21 22 23 24 25 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANS UNION, L.L.C.; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, L.L.C.; CHASE HOME LENDING a subsidiary of JP MORGAN CHASE, N.A.; SETER US, INC., formerly known as IBM LENDER BUSINESS PROCESS SERVICES, INC.; Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00498-LHK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY 26 27 28 Plaintiff Timothy Zorio, by counsel, and Defendant Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”), by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein between them have been STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 5:12-CV-00498-LHK Page 1 of 3 Case5:12-cv-00498-LHK Document45 Filed06/01/12 Page2 of 3 1 compromised and settled, and that Plaintiff’s cause against Trans Union only should be 2 dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. Respectfully submitted, 3 4 5 Date: 5/31/2012 6 7 8 9 10 s/ Anita L. Steburg (w/consent) Anita L. Steburg, Esq. Steburg Law Firm 1798 Technology Drive, Suite 258 San Jose, CA 95110 Telephone: 408-573-1122 Fax: 408-573-1126 E-mail: anita@steburglawfirm.com Counsel for Timothy Zorio 11 12 13 18 s/ Amanda E. Glowacki Amanda E. Glowacki, Esq. (IN #29972-21) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Schuckit & Associates, P.C. 4545 Northwestern Drive Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: 317-363-2400 Fax: 317-363-2257 E-Mail: aglowacki@schuckitlaw.com 19 Lead Counsel for Trans Union, LLC 14 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Date: June 1, 2012 Michael W. Bien, Esq. (CSB #96891) Sumana Cooppan, Esq. (CSB #267967) Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-433-6830 Fax: 415-433-7104 E-Mail: mbien@rbg-law.com scooppan@rbg-law.com Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 5:12-CV-00498-LHK Page 2 of 3 Case5:12-cv-00498-LHK Document45 Filed06/01/12 Page3 of 3 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Trans Union, LLC is 2 dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff Timothy Zorio and Defendant Trans Union, LLC shall each 3 bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 4 5 6 June 11, 2012 Date: ________________________ 7 ____________________________________ JUDGE, United States District Court, Northern District of California 8 9 10 11 12 13 DISTRIBUTION TO: Anita Louise Steburg, Esq. anita@steburglawfirm.com Michael Robert McLively, Esq. mrmclively@jonesday.com David Owens, Esq. owensd2@bryancave.com Timothy Matthew Ryan, Esq. ecf@theryanfirm.com Sumana Cooppan, Esq. scooppan@rbg-law.com Amanda E. Glowacki, Esq. aglowacki@schuckitlaw.com 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 5:12-CV-00498-LHK Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?