Zorio v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al

Filing 89

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 87 Stipulation (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2013)

Case5:12-cv-00498-LHK Document87 Filed01/30/13 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4

Anita L. Steburg, State Bar No. 245933
1798 Technology Drive, Suite 258
San Jose, CA 95110
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff
TIMOTHY ZORIO

5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

TIMOTHY ZORIO, an individual,
Case No.: CV12-00498 LHK
Plaintiff,

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANS UNION
L.L.C.; EQUIFAX INFORMATION
SERVICES, L.L.C.; CHASE HOME
LENDING a subsidiary of JP
MORGAN CHASE, N.A.; SETERUS,
INC. formerly known as IBM LENDER
BUSINESS PROCESS SERVICES,
INC.,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT JP MORGAN CHASE
BANK, N.A., ONLY

Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND JP
MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ONLY - 12-CV-00498-LHK

Case5:12-cv-00498-LHK Document87 Filed01/30/13 Page2 of 3

1
2
3
4

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Timothy Zorio and Defendant

5

JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with

6

prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

7
8

Respectfully Submitted,

9
10

DATED: January 29, 2013

STEBURG LAW FIRM

11
By:

12

/s/ Anita L. Steburg
Anita L. Steburg
Attorney for Plaintiff
TIMOTHY ZORIO

13
14
15
16
17

DATED: January 29, 2013

BRYAN CAVE, LLP
By:

/s/ David A. Owens
David A. Owens
Attorneys for Defendant
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND JP
MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ONLY - 12-CV-00498-LHK

Case5:12-cv-00498-LHK Document87 Filed01/30/13 Page3 of 3

1
2
3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that plaintiff Timothy Zorio and

4

Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

5

Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

6
7
8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 30, 2013
DATED:_________________________

_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND JP
MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ONLY - 12-CV-00498-LHK