Calub v. Creditor's Interchange Receivable Management, LLC et al

Filing 19

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 10 Stipulation selecting Mediation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2012)

Case5:12-cv-00524-LHK Document10 Filed03/30/12 Page1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHRISTOPHER CALUB
CASE NO. 12-CV-00524
Plaintiffs),
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

v.
CREDITOR'S INTERCI-iAKGj__j_L-L.
Defendant(s).
/

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Q Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
D Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
V Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in cm
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They mitst instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
0 Pri vate AD R (please identify process and provider')

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
y*H the presumptive deadline ffhe deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless olhenvise ordered.)
to an ADR process
eferring
0 other requested deadline

,?t

Dated:

Dated:3 30 i'^

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case5:12-cv-00524-LHK Document10 Filed03/30/12 Page2 of 2

0 The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
D The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and II IS SO OKDbKtu.

Dated:

April 26, 2012
UNITED

S TAT E S

JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2