Calub v. Creditor's Interchange Receivable Management, LLC et al

Filing 19

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 10 Stipulation selecting Mediation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2012)

Download PDF
Case5:12-cv-00524-LHK Document10 Filed03/30/12 Page1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHRISTOPHER CALUB CASE NO. 12-CV-00524 Plaintiffs), STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS v. CREDITOR'S INTERCI-iAKGj__j_L-L. Defendant(s). / Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Q Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) D Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) V Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in cm ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They mitst instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: 0 Pri vate AD R (please identify process and provider') The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: y*H the presumptive deadline ffhe deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless olhenvise ordered.) to an ADR process eferring 0 other requested deadline ,?t Dated: Dated:3 30 i'^ CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED] ORDER Case5:12-cv-00524-LHK Document10 Filed03/30/12 Page2 of 2 0 The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. D The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and II IS SO OKDbKtu. Dated: April 26, 2012 UNITED S TAT E S JUDGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation." Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?