Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
100
ORDER re #97 Stipulation, filed by Apple Inc. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 4/16/2012. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
7
SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
APPLE INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; and SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants.
)
17
18
Case No.: 12-cv-00630-LHK (PSG)
ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART
STIPULATION REQUESTING
ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME FOR
BRIEFING AND HEARING ON
APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
AND THINGS AND APPLE’S
MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES
TO INTERROGATORIES
(Re: Docket No. 97)
In this patent infringement suit, Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and Defendants Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications
19
America, LLC (“Samsung”) have submitted a stipulation and agreement to modify the briefing and
20
21
hearing schedule regarding Apple’s Motions to Compel.
The parties have submitted the following modified briefing and hearing schedule regarding
22
23
Apple’s Motions to Compel:
24
•
25
•
•
26
27
28
Apple filed its Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories and its Motion to Compel
Production of Documents and Things on April 13, 2012, and April 16, 2012, respectively;
Samsung will file its Oppositions to Apple’s Motions by April 18, 2012;
Apple will file its Replies to Samsung’s Oppositions by April 20, 2012.
1
Case No.: 12-cv-00630-LHK (PSG)
ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER TO SHORTEN
TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS AND APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL
RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
1
The parties have proposed a hearing on the motions for April 24, 2012. The parties’
2
stipulation to extend time complies with Civ. L.R. 6-2. The court, however, cannot accommodate
3
the parties’ last request, and will instead schedule a hearing on the motions for May 1, 2012.
4
Furthermore, the court directs the parties to review the court’s order in Apple Inc. v. Samsung
5
Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., Case No. 5:11-cv-01846-LHK, Docket No. 699, for guidance
6
regarding future requests to shorten time. The court cannot overlook its duty to balance the
7
8
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
9
legitimate needs of the parties in this case against the impact on other litigants who seek to be
heard on a reasonable schedule. The court accordingly GRANTS-IN-PART the parties’ stipulation
10
requesting an order to shorten time for briefing and hearing on Apple’s Motions to Compel.
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
Dated: 4/16/2012
13
_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-cv-00630-LHK (PSG)
ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER TO SHORTEN
TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS AND APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL
RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?