Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 1075

Order Granting #1063 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 12/17/2013. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2013)

Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1063 Filed12/16/13 Page1 of 5

1

[COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGES]

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14

SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
16 corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
17 Delaware limited liability company,
18

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-000630-LHK (PSG)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE PUBLIC
REDACTED VERSIONS OF
DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE
COURT’S DECEMBER 12, 2013
ORDER REGARDING RENEWED
SEALING PAPERS

Defendants.

19

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
20 Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
21 corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
22 Delaware limited liability company,
23
24

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,
v.

25 APPLE INC., a California corporation,
26

Counterclaim-Defendant.

27
28

Case No. 12-cv-000630-LHK (PSG)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE PUBLIC REDACTED VERSIONS OF DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE COURT’S
DECEMBER 12, 2013 ORDER REGARDING RENEWED SEALING PAPERS

Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1063 Filed12/16/13 Page2 of 5

1

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America,

2 Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung”) and Apple Inc.
3 (“Apple”) file this Stipulation regarding the time to comply with the Civil Local Rule 794 5(d)(1)(C).
5

WHEREAS, on December 12, 2013, the Court denied without prejudice all motions to seal

6 relating to Apple’s and Samsung’s Motions for Summary Judgment and Samsung’s Motion to
7 Enforce (see Dkt. No. 1057);
8

WHEREAS, on December 12, 2013, the Court, after consulting with the parties as to when

9 they can file the renewed motions, ordered the parties to file renewed motions to seal on
10 December 16, 2013 (see id.);
11

WHEREAS, the parties have conferred regarding the Court’s Order and have worked

12 diligently to review the documents at issue to meet the Court’s deadline;
13

WHEREAS, the parties will file renewed sealing motions and an unredacted version of

14 each document highlighting the portions of the document that the parties seek to seal on December
15 16, 2013;
16

WHEREAS, the parties will file publicly unredacted versions of documents not subject to

17 renewed motions to seal in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5(f) within seven days of the
18 Court’s Order on December 12, 2013;
19

WHEREAS, the documents subject to the parties’ renewed motions to seal contain

20 information designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” by third
21 parties;
22

WHEREAS, the parties have concluded that they need additional time to consult with third

23 parties and prepare public redacted versions of the aforementioned documents;
24

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the

25 parties that:
26
27
28

1. The parties shall file public redacted versions of the documents that they seek to seal no
later than seven days from the filing date of the renewed motions to seal.
Case No. 12-cv-000630-LHK (PSG)
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE PUBLIC REDACTED VERSIONS OF DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE COURT’S
DECEMBER 12, 2013 ORDER REGARDING RENEWED SEALING PAPERS

Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1063 Filed12/16/13 Page3 of 5

1

***

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER

3

Based on the foregoing stipulation,

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7
8

Dated: December 17 2013
___________,

9
10
11

By:

HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 12-cv-000630-LHK (PSG)
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE PUBLIC REDACTED VERSIONS OF DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE COURT’S
DECEMBER 12, 2013 ORDER REGARDING RENEWED SEALING PAPERS