Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
1275
Order Vacating February 20, 2014 Hearing; Requesting Settlement Status Update. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 2/18/2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
)
)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
)
corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
21
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 20,
2014 HEARING; REQUESTING
SETTLEMENT STATUS UPDATE
Concluding that Samsung’s motion to strike expert testimony based on undisclosed claim
22
constructions, see Dkt. 1138-4, is appropriate for resolution without oral argument, the Court
23
hereby VACATES the hearing scheduled for February 20, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. The Court also
24
VACATES the case management conference scheduled for the same date and time.
25
The Court requests that the parties file a joint report as to the status of the settlement
26
discussions referenced in the parties’ Joint Proposal Regarding Pre-March 2014 Settlement
27
Discussions, filed in Case No. 11-1846 at Dkt. 2914 (Jan. 8, 2014), by Friday, February 21,
28
2014.
1
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 20, 2014 HEARING; REQUESTING STATUS UPDATE
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: February 18, 2014
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 20, 2014 HEARING; REQUESTING STATUS UPDATE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?