Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 1415

ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL: (Re: Docket Nos. #476 , #490 , #498 , #516 , #526 , #528 , #531 , #533 , #540 , #541 , #561 , #563 , #577 , #582 , #592 , #593 , #613 , #632 , #649 , #656 , #669 , #676 , #681 , #689 , #711 , #721 , #738 , #742 and #743 ). Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 3/7/2014. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN JOSE DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a ) ) Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York ) corporation; and SAMSUNG ) TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, ) a Delaware limited liability company, ) ) Defendants. ) ) APPLE INC., a California Corporation, Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL (Re: Docket Nos. 476, 490, 498, 516, 526, 528, 531, 533, 540, 541, 561, 563, 577, 582, 592, 593, 613, 632, 649, 656, 669, 676, 681, 689, 711, 721, 738, 742, 743) Before the court are 29 administrative motions to seal 179 documents. “Historically, courts 22 23 have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including 24 judicial records and documents.’” 1 Accordingly, when considering a sealing request, “a ‘strong 25 presumption in favor of access’ is the starting point.” 2 Parties seeking to seal judicial records 26 27 28 1 Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n. 7 (1978)). 1 Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL 1 2 relating to dispositive motions bear the burden of overcoming the presumption with “compelling reasons” that outweigh the general history of access and the public policies favoring disclosure. 3 3 However, “while protecting the public's interest in access to the courts, we must remain 4 mindful of the parties' right to access those same courts upon terms which will not unduly harm 5 their competitive interest.” 4 Records attached to nondispositive motions therefore are not subject 6 to the strong presumption of access. 5 Because the documents attached to nondispositive motions 7 “are often unrelated, or only tangentially related, to the underlying cause of action,” parties moving 8 9 to seal must meet the lower “good cause” standard of Rule 26(c). 6 As with dispositive motions, the United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 standard applicable to nondispositive motions requires a “particularized showing” 7 that “specific 11 prejudice or harm will result” if the information is disclosed. 8 “Broad allegations of harm, 12 unsubstantiated by specific examples of articulated reasoning” will not suffice. 9 A protective order 13 14 sealing the documents during discovery may reflect the court’s previous determination that good cause exists to keep the documents sealed, 10 but a blanket protective order that allows the parties to 15 16 17 18 19 2 Id. (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). 20 3 Id. at 1178-79. 21 4 Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 727 F.3d 1214, 1228-29 (Fed. Cir. 2013). 22 5 See id. at 1180. 23 6 Id. at 1179 (internal quotations and citations omitted). 24 7 Id. 25 8 26 Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). 9 27 Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int’l Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470, 476 (9th Cir. 1992). 10 28 See Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179-80. 2 Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL 1 2 designate confidential documents does not provide sufficient judicial scrutiny to determine whether each particular document should remain sealed. 11 In addition to making particularized showings of good cause, parties moving to seal 3 4 documents must comply with the procedures established by Civ. L.R. 79-5. Pursuant to 5 Civ. L.R. 79-5(b), a sealing order is appropriate only upon a request that establishes the document 6 is “sealable,” or “privileged or protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under 7 the law.” “The request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material, and 8 9 must conform with Civil L.R. 79-5(d).” 12 “Within 4 days of the filing of the Administrative United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Motion to File Under Seal, the Designating Party must file a declaration as required by subsection 11 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated material is sealable.” 13 12 13 14 With these standards in mind, the courts rules on the instant motions as follows: Motion to Seal 476 15 16 476/490 17 18 476 19 20 476 21 Document to be Sealed Samsung's Motion to Amend Infringement Contention Exhibit 4 to the Briggs Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Amend Infringement Contention Exhibit 6 to the Briggs Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Amend Infringement Contention Exhibit 7 to the Briggs Result Reason/Explanation UNSEALED No declaration filed SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information UNSEALED No declaration filed UNSEALED No declaration filed 11 22 23 24 25 26 See Civ. L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(A) (“Reference to a stipulation or protective order that allows a party to designate certain documents as confidential is not sufficient to establish that a document, or portions thereof, are sealable.”). 12 Civ. L.R. 79-5(b). In part, Civ. L.R. 79-5(d) requires the submitting party to attach a “proposed order that is narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material” which “lists in table format each document or portion thereof that is sought to be sealed,” Civ. L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(b), and an “unreadacted version of the document” that indicates “by highlighting or other clear method, the portions of the document that have been omitted from the redacted version.” Civ. L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(d). 13 27 28 Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1). The Civil Local Rules have recently been amended shortening the time available to the designating party to file a supporting declaration from seven days to four days. As this rule change was only recently implemented the court applies the prior form of Civ. L.R. 79-5 for the purposes of this order. 3 Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL 1 2 476 3 4 5 476 6 7 476 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 498 498 11 12 498 13 14 15 498 16 17 516 18 19 20 516 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 516 Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Amend Infringement Contention Exhibit 8 to the Briggs Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Amend Infringement Contention Exhibit 9 to the Briggs Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Amend Infringement Contention Exhibit 10 to the Briggs Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Amend Infringement Contention Samsung's Motion to Compel Complete Production of Source Code Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Complete Production of Source Code Exhibit 19 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Complete Production of Source Code Exhibit 26 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Complete Production of Source Code Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Its Infringement Contentions Exhibit 1 to the Selwyn Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Its Infringement Contentions Exhibit 2 to the Selwyn Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Its Infringement Contentions UNSEALED No declaration filed UNSEALED No declaration filed SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED as amended by Docket No. 515 Narrowly tailored to confidential business information Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED SEALED as amended by Docket No. 515 Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED as amended by Docket No. 515 Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information UNSEALED No declaration filed 4 Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL 1 516 2 3 4 5 516 6 7 8 9 516 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 516 14 15 16 17 516 18 19 20 21 516 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 516 Exhibit 3 to the Selwyn Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Its Infringement Contentions Exhibit 4 to the Selwyn Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Its Infringement Contentions Exhibit 5 to the Selwyn Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Its Infringement Contentions Exhibit 6 to the Selwyn Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Its Infringement Contentions Exhibit 9 to the Selwyn Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Its Infringement Contentions Exhibit 10 to the Selwyn Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Its Infringement Contentions Exhibit 11 to the Selwyn Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Its Infringement SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information 5 Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL 1 526 2 3 4 528 5 6 528 7 8 9 528 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 528 12 13 14 528 15 16 528 17 18 19 531 20 21 531 22 23 24 533 25 26 27 28 533 Contentions Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Joshua Furman ISO Apple’s Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Its Infringement Contentions Samsung's Reply in Support of Motion to Amend Infringement Contentions Exhibit 4 to the Briggs Declaration ISO Samsung's Reply in Support of Motion to Amend Infringement Contentions Exhibit 5 to the Briggs Declaration ISO Samsung's Reply in Support of Motion to Amend Infringement Contentions Exhibit 6 to the Briggs Declaration ISO Samsung's Reply in Support of Motion to Amend Infringement Contentions Exhibit 7 to the Briggs Declaration ISO Samsung's Reply in Support of Motion to Amend Infringement Contentions Exhibit 8 to the Briggs Declaration ISO Samsung's Reply in Support of Motion to Amend Infringement Contentions Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Documents from Related Litigations Exhibit 19 to the Kolovos Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Documents from Related Litigations Arrouye Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Documents from Related Litigations Chu Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Documents from UNSEALED Not narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED as amended in Docket No. 542 Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information UNSEALED No declaration filed SEALED as amended in Docket No. 542 Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information UNSEALED Declaration submitted indicating no redaction necessary Declaration submitted indicating no redaction necessary UNSEALED SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information 6 Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL 1 533 2 3 4 533 5 6 533 7 8 9 533 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 533 12 13 14 540 15 16 540 17 18 540 19 20 21 540 22 23 540 24 25 26 27 28 540 Related Litigations Krugler Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Documents from Related Litigations Lew Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Documents from Related Litigations Manickam Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Documents from Related Litigations McFarlane Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Documents from Related Litigations Shenoy Declaration ISO Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Documents from Related Litigations Samsung’s Motion For Leave to Amend Its Invalidity Contentions Exhibit 3 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Motion For Leave to Amend Its Invalidity Contentions Exhibit 10 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Motion For Leave to Amend Its Invalidity Contentions Exhibit 17 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Motion For Leave to Amend Its Invalidity Contentions Exhibit 18 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Motion For Leave to Amend Its Invalidity Contentions Exhibit 19 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Motion For Leave to Amend Its Invalidity Contentions SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information UNSEALED Declaration submitted indicating no redaction necessary Declaration submitted indicating no redaction necessary UNSEALED UNSEALED Declaration submitted indicating no redaction necessary UNSEALED Not narrowly tailored to confidential business information UNSEALED Not narrowly tailored to confidential business information UNSEALED Declaration submitted indicating no redaction necessary 7 Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL 1 540 2 3 540 4 5 6 541 7 8 541 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 541 12 13 14 541 15 16 17 541 18 19 20 541 21 22 23 541 24 25 26 27 28 541 Exhibit 20 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Motion For Leave to Amend Its Invalidity Contentions Exhibit 22 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Motion For Leave to Amend Its Invalidity Contentions Samsung’s Motion To Preclude Apple From Asserting Untimely Dates Of Conception Exhibit C to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Motion To Preclude Apple From Asserting Untimely Dates Of Conception Exhibit D to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Motion To Preclude Apple From Asserting Untimely Dates Of Conception Exhibit E to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Motion To Preclude Apple From Asserting Untimely Dates Of Conception Exhibit F to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Motion To Preclude Apple From Asserting Untimely Dates Of Conception Exhibit G to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Motion To Preclude Apple From Asserting Untimely Dates Of Conception Exhibit H to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Motion To Preclude Apple From Asserting Untimely Dates Of Conception Exhibit I to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Motion To Preclude Apple From Asserting Untimely Dates SEALED as amended by Docket No. 657 Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED as amended by Docket No. 657 Narrowly tailored to confidential business information UNSEALED No declaration filed UNSEALED No declaration filed UNSEALED No declaration filed UNSEALED No declaration filed UNSEALED No declaration filed UNSEALED No declaration filed UNSEALED No declaration filed UNSEALED No declaration filed 8 Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL 1 541 2 3 4 541 5 6 7 561 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 563 11 12 563 13 14 15 563 16 17 18 563 19 20 21 563 22 23 24 577 25 26 27 28 577 Of Conception Exhibit J to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Motion To Preclude Apple From Asserting Untimely Dates Of Conception Exhibit K to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Motion To Preclude Apple From Asserting Untimely Dates Of Conception Exhibit A to the Declaration of Amar Thakur ISO Samsung’s Reply On Its MTC Documents From Related Litigations Samsung’s Reply ISO Motion to Compel Complete Production of Source Code Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Reply ISO Motion to Compel Complete Production of Source Code Exhibit 3 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Reply ISO Motion to Compel Complete Production of Source Code Exhibit 4 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Reply ISO Motion to Compel Complete Production of Source Code Exhibit 10 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung’s Reply ISO Motion to Compel Complete Production of Source Code Samsung’s Supplemental Brief ISO Samsung's Motion to Amend Invalidity Contentions Briggs Declaration ISO Samsung’s Supplemental Brief ISO Samsung's Motion to Amend Invalidity Contentions UNSEALED No declaration filed UNSEALED No declaration filed SEALED as amended by Docket No. 586 Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED as amended by Docket No. 587-1 Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED as amended by Docket No. 587-2 Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED as amended by Docket No. 587-3 Narrowly tailored to confidential business information UNSEALED except last 3 pages, Public information which remain SEALED SEALED as amended by Docket No. 587-4 Narrowly tailored to confidential business information UNSEALED Declaration submitted indicating no redaction necessary Declaration submitted indicating no redaction necessary UNSEALED 9 Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL 1 577 2 3 4 577 5 6 7 577 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 577 11 12 13 582 14 15 592 16 17 18 592 19 20 21 592 22 23 24 593 25 26 27 28 613 Exhibit 1 to Briggs Declaration ISO Samsung’s Supplemental Brief ISO Samsung's Motion to Amend Invalidity Contentions Exhibit 2 to Briggs Declaration ISO Samsung’s Supplemental Brief ISO Samsung's Motion to Amend Invalidity Contentions Exhibit 3 to Briggs Declaration ISO Samsung’s Supplemental Brief ISO Samsung's Motion to Amend Invalidity Contentions Exhibit 4 to Briggs Declaration ISO Samsung’s Supplemental Brief ISO Samsung's Motion to Amend Invalidity Contentions Apple's Opposition to Samsung's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Briefing Exhibit 2 to Supplemental Furman Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Its Infringement Contentions Exhibit 3 to Supplemental Furman Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Its Infringement Contentions Exhibit 4 to Supplemental Furman Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Its Infringement Contentions Exhibits B and L to the Declaration of Brian Buroker ISO Apple's Opposition to Samsung's Motion to Preclude Apple From Asserting Untimely Dates of Conception Samsung's Reply in Support of its Motion for UNSEALED Defended solely on attorney-client privilege grounds; privilege waived by production SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information UNSEALED Defended solely on attorney-client privilege grounds; privilege waived by production UNSEALED Defended solely on attorney-client privilege grounds; privilege waived by production UNSEALED Declaration submitted indicating no redaction necessary Not narrowly tailored to confidential business information UNSEALED UNSEALED Not narrowly tailored to confidential business information UNSEALED Not moved under seal UNSEALED Declaration submitted indicating no redaction necessary UNSEALED No declaration filed 10 Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL 1 2 632 3 Leave to Amend Invalidity Contentions Samsung’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No 32 4 5 6 632 7 8 9 632 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 632 12 13 14 632 15 16 Exhibit 4 to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No 32 Exhibit 12 to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No 32 Exhibit 25 to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No 32 Exhibit 26 to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No 32 17 SEALED 12:1-13: 1 13:7 14:6-7 14:17-20 UNSEALED 6:1-25 13:5-6 13:8-9 14: 2-6 14:7-8 14: 14-17 14:20-25 15:1-25 SEALED as amended by Docket No. 655-2 Sealed portions reflect narrow tailoring to protect confidential business information. Unsealed portions do not. SEALED as amended by Docket No. 655-3 Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED 13: 5-8 20:19-21:8 21:25-22:1 22:22 32:6-7 33: 3-4 18 19 20 21 632 22 23 632 24 25 26 27 28 632 Exhibit 31 to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No 32 Exhibit 32 to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No 32 Exhibit 33 to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No 32 SEALED Sealed portions reflect narrow tailoring to protect confidential business information. Unsealed portions do not. Page numbers varied between versions. For purposes of this order, pg. 12 correlates to pg. 67 of deposition testimony. Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information 11 Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL UNSEALED 12:1-25 13:1-4, 9-25 14:1-20:8 20: 9-12 21: 10-24 22: 2-21 22:23-31:25 32: 1-12 33: 6-25 34: 1-25 Narrowly tailored to confidential business information 1 632 Exhibit 34 to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No 32 SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information 632 Exhibit 35 to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No 32 Exhibit 36 to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No 32 CORRECTED Exhibit A to Stipulation re Samsungs Proposed Invalidity Contentions Exhibit 2 to Michael Valek’s Declaration ISO Apple Inc.'s Opposition to Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash Apple's Subpoenas for the Production of Documents and Testimony Exhibit 13 to Shannon Mader’s Declaration ISO Apple Inc.'s Opposition to Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash Apple's Subpoenas for the Production of Documents and Testimony SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information UNSEALED except pg. 12 (deposition transcript pg. 111), which shall remain SEALED Public information UNSEALED No declaration filed UNSEALED Public information SEALED as follows: 10:2, 10: 21, 11: 1, 12: 4, 12: 25-27. Remainder UNSEALED Sealed portions reflect narrow tailoring to protect confidential business information. Unsealed portions do not. Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 5 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 6 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel UNSEALED Public information UNSEALED Public information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information 2 3 4 5 6 632 7 8 9 649 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 656 12 13 14 656 15 16 17 18 669 19 20 21 669 22 23 24 669 25 26 27 28 669 12 Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL 1 2 669 3 4 5 669 6 7 8 669 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 669 12 13 14 669 15 16 17 669 18 19 20 669 21 22 23 669 24 25 26 27 28 669 Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 7 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 8 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 9 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 10 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 11 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 12 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 13 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 14 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 15 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial UNSEALED Not marked confidential, and public information UNSEALED Not marked confidential, and public information UNSEALED Not marked confidential, and public information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information 13 Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL 1 2 669 3 4 5 669 6 7 8 669 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 669 12 13 14 669 15 16 17 669 18 19 20 669 21 22 23 669 24 25 26 27 28 669 Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 16 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 17 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 18 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 19 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 20 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 21 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 22 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 23 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 24 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information 14 Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL 1 669 2 3 4 676 5 6 the April 12, 2013 Order Exhibit 25 to Thakur Declaration ISO Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Apple's Opposition to Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No. 32 SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information Pgs. 3, 13: SEALED Remainder: UNSEALED Sealed portions reflect narrow tailoring to protect confidential business information. Unsealed portions do not. No declaration submitted 7 8 676 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 676 12 13 14 676 15 16 17 18 19 681 689 20 21 22 689 23 24 25 26 27 28 689 Walden Declaration ISO Apple's Opposition to Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No. 32 Exhibit A to Walden Declaration ISO Apple's Opposition to Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No. 32 Exhibit B to Walden Declaration ISO Apple's Opposition to Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No. 32 Apple’s Amended Infringement Contentions UNSEALED Samsung's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No. 32 Drezdzon’s Declaration ISO Samsung's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No. 32 Exhibit 37 to Drezdzon’s Declaration ISO Samsung's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No. 32 UNSEALED SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information UNSEALED No declaration submitted UNSEALED Not narrowly tailored to confidential business information No declaration submitted UNSEALED No declaration submitted SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information 15 Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL 1 689 2 3 4 689 5 6 7 8 689 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 711 12 13 14 721 15 16 738 17 18 742 19 20 21 743 Exhibit 38 to Drezdzon’s Declaration ISO Samsung's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No. 32 Exhibit 39 to Drezdzon’s Declaration ISO Samsung's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No. 32 Exhibit 40 to Drezdzon’s Declaration ISO Samsung's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Response to Interrogatory No. 32 Apple's Opposition to Samsung's Motion to Compel Production of Financial Documents and to Enforce the April 12, 2013 Order Samsung's Reply In Support of Motion to Compel Financial Documents and Exhibits Apple’s Notice of Joinder in Nokia’s Motion for a Protective Order Stipulation With Proposed Order Re Motion For Protective Order By Nokia Corporation Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Notice of Joinder in Nokia’s Motion for a Protective Order SEALED as amended by Docket No. 702 Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED as amended by Docket No. 702 Narrowly tailored to confidential business information SEALED Narrowly tailored to confidential business information UNSEALED Public information UNSEALED Public information UNSEALED Public information UNSEALED Public information UNSEALED Public information 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: March 7, 2014 25 _________________________________ 26 PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 27 28 16 Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?