Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
1415
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL: (Re: Docket Nos. #476 , #490 , #498 , #516 , #526 , #528 , #531 , #533 , #540 , #541 , #561 , #563 , #577 , #582 , #592 , #593 , #613 , #632 , #649 , #656 , #669 , #676 , #681 , #689 , #711 , #721 , #738 , #742 and #743 ). Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 3/7/2014. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN JOSE DIVISION
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; and SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
APPLE INC., a California Corporation,
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
(Re: Docket Nos. 476, 490, 498, 516, 526,
528, 531, 533, 540, 541, 561, 563, 577,
582, 592, 593, 613, 632, 649, 656, 669,
676, 681, 689, 711, 721, 738, 742, 743)
Before the court are 29 administrative motions to seal 179 documents. “Historically, courts
22
23
have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including
24
judicial records and documents.’” 1 Accordingly, when considering a sealing request, “a ‘strong
25
presumption in favor of access’ is the starting point.” 2 Parties seeking to seal judicial records
26
27
28
1
Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)
(quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n. 7 (1978)).
1
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
1
2
relating to dispositive motions bear the burden of overcoming the presumption with “compelling
reasons” that outweigh the general history of access and the public policies favoring disclosure. 3
3
However, “while protecting the public's interest in access to the courts, we must remain
4
mindful of the parties' right to access those same courts upon terms which will not unduly harm
5
their competitive interest.” 4 Records attached to nondispositive motions therefore are not subject
6
to the strong presumption of access. 5 Because the documents attached to nondispositive motions
7
“are often unrelated, or only tangentially related, to the underlying cause of action,” parties moving
8
9
to seal must meet the lower “good cause” standard of Rule 26(c). 6 As with dispositive motions, the
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
standard applicable to nondispositive motions requires a “particularized showing” 7 that “specific
11
prejudice or harm will result” if the information is disclosed. 8 “Broad allegations of harm,
12
unsubstantiated by specific examples of articulated reasoning” will not suffice. 9 A protective order
13
14
sealing the documents during discovery may reflect the court’s previous determination that good
cause exists to keep the documents sealed, 10 but a blanket protective order that allows the parties to
15
16
17
18
19
2
Id. (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)).
20
3
Id. at 1178-79.
21
4
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 727 F.3d 1214, 1228-29 (Fed. Cir. 2013).
22
5
See id. at 1180.
23
6
Id. at 1179 (internal quotations and citations omitted).
24
7
Id.
25
8
26
Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002);
see Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c).
9
27
Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int’l Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470, 476 (9th Cir. 1992).
10
28
See Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179-80.
2
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
1
2
designate confidential documents does not provide sufficient judicial scrutiny to determine whether
each particular document should remain sealed. 11
In addition to making particularized showings of good cause, parties moving to seal
3
4
documents must comply with the procedures established by Civ. L.R. 79-5. Pursuant to
5
Civ. L.R. 79-5(b), a sealing order is appropriate only upon a request that establishes the document
6
is “sealable,” or “privileged or protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under
7
the law.” “The request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material, and
8
9
must conform with Civil L.R. 79-5(d).” 12 “Within 4 days of the filing of the Administrative
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Motion to File Under Seal, the Designating Party must file a declaration as required by subsection
11
79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated material is sealable.” 13
12
13
14
With these standards in mind, the courts rules on the instant motions as follows:
Motion
to Seal
476
15
16
476/490
17
18
476
19
20
476
21
Document to be Sealed
Samsung's Motion to
Amend Infringement
Contention
Exhibit 4 to the Briggs
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Amend
Infringement Contention
Exhibit 6 to the Briggs
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Amend
Infringement Contention
Exhibit 7 to the Briggs
Result
Reason/Explanation
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
11
22
23
24
25
26
See Civ. L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(A) (“Reference to a stipulation or protective order that allows a party to
designate certain documents as confidential is not sufficient to establish that a document, or
portions thereof, are sealable.”).
12
Civ. L.R. 79-5(b). In part, Civ. L.R. 79-5(d) requires the submitting party to attach a “proposed
order that is narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material” which “lists in table format each
document or portion thereof that is sought to be sealed,” Civ. L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(b), and an
“unreadacted version of the document” that indicates “by highlighting or other clear method, the
portions of the document that have been omitted from the redacted version.”
Civ. L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(d).
13
27
28
Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1). The Civil Local Rules have recently been amended shortening the time
available to the designating party to file a supporting declaration from seven days to four days. As
this rule change was only recently implemented the court applies the prior form of Civ. L.R. 79-5
for the purposes of this order.
3
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
1
2
476
3
4
5
476
6
7
476
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
498
498
11
12
498
13
14
15
498
16
17
516
18
19
20
516
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
516
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Amend
Infringement Contention
Exhibit 8 to the Briggs
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Amend
Infringement Contention
Exhibit 9 to the Briggs
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Amend
Infringement Contention
Exhibit 10 to the Briggs
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Amend
Infringement Contention
Samsung's Motion to
Compel Complete
Production of Source Code
Thakur Declaration ISO
Samsung's Motion to
Compel Complete
Production of Source Code
Exhibit 19 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Complete Production of
Source Code
Exhibit 26 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Complete Production of
Source Code
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion for
Leave to Amend and
Supplement Its
Infringement
Contentions
Exhibit 1 to the Selwyn
Declaration ISO
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion for
Leave to Amend and
Supplement Its
Infringement
Contentions
Exhibit 2 to the Selwyn
Declaration ISO
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion for
Leave to Amend and
Supplement Its
Infringement
Contentions
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED as amended by Docket
No. 515
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
SEALED as amended by Docket
No. 515
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED as amended by Docket
No. 515
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
4
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
1
516
2
3
4
5
516
6
7
8
9
516
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
516
14
15
16
17
516
18
19
20
21
516
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
516
Exhibit 3 to the Selwyn
Declaration ISO
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion for
Leave to Amend and
Supplement Its
Infringement
Contentions
Exhibit 4 to the Selwyn
Declaration ISO
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion for
Leave to Amend and
Supplement Its
Infringement
Contentions
Exhibit 5 to the Selwyn
Declaration ISO
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion for
Leave to Amend and
Supplement Its
Infringement
Contentions
Exhibit 6 to the Selwyn
Declaration ISO
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion for
Leave to Amend and
Supplement Its
Infringement
Contentions
Exhibit 9 to the Selwyn
Declaration ISO
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion for
Leave to Amend and
Supplement Its
Infringement
Contentions
Exhibit 10 to the Selwyn
Declaration ISO
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion for
Leave to Amend and
Supplement Its
Infringement
Contentions
Exhibit 11 to the Selwyn
Declaration ISO
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion for
Leave to Amend and
Supplement Its
Infringement
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
5
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
1
526
2
3
4
528
5
6
528
7
8
9
528
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
528
12
13
14
528
15
16
528
17
18
19
531
20
21
531
22
23
24
533
25
26
27
28
533
Contentions
Exhibit 1 to the Declaration
of Joshua Furman ISO
Apple’s Motion for Leave
to Amend
and Supplement Its
Infringement Contentions
Samsung's Reply in
Support of Motion to
Amend Infringement
Contentions
Exhibit 4 to the Briggs
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Reply in Support of
Motion to Amend
Infringement Contentions
Exhibit 5 to the Briggs
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Reply in Support of
Motion to Amend
Infringement Contentions
Exhibit 6 to the Briggs
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Reply in Support of
Motion to Amend
Infringement Contentions
Exhibit 7 to the Briggs
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Reply in Support of
Motion to Amend
Infringement Contentions
Exhibit 8 to the Briggs
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Reply in Support of
Motion to Amend
Infringement Contentions
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion to
Compel Documents from
Related Litigations
Exhibit 19 to the Kolovos
Declaration ISO Apple’s
Opposition to Samsung’s
Motion to Compel
Documents from
Related Litigations
Arrouye Declaration ISO
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion to
Compel Documents from
Related Litigations
Chu Declaration ISO
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion to
Compel Documents from
UNSEALED
Not narrowly tailored
to confidential
business information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED as amended in Docket
No. 542
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
SEALED as amended in Docket
No. 542
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
UNSEALED
Declaration
submitted indicating
no redaction
necessary
Declaration
submitted indicating
no redaction
necessary
UNSEALED
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
6
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
1
533
2
3
4
533
5
6
533
7
8
9
533
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
533
12
13
14
540
15
16
540
17
18
540
19
20
21
540
22
23
540
24
25
26
27
28
540
Related Litigations
Krugler Declaration ISO
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion to
Compel Documents from
Related Litigations
Lew Declaration ISO
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion to
Compel Documents from
Related Litigations
Manickam Declaration ISO
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion to
Compel Documents from
Related Litigations
McFarlane Declaration ISO
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion to
Compel Documents from
Related Litigations
Shenoy Declaration ISO
Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion to
Compel Documents from
Related Litigations
Samsung’s Motion For
Leave to Amend Its
Invalidity Contentions
Exhibit 3 to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Motion For
Leave to Amend Its
Invalidity Contentions
Exhibit 10 to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Motion For
Leave to Amend Its
Invalidity Contentions
Exhibit 17 to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Motion For
Leave to Amend Its
Invalidity Contentions
Exhibit 18 to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Motion For
Leave to Amend Its
Invalidity Contentions
Exhibit 19 to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Motion For
Leave to Amend Its
Invalidity Contentions
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
UNSEALED
Declaration
submitted indicating
no redaction
necessary
Declaration
submitted indicating
no redaction
necessary
UNSEALED
UNSEALED
Declaration
submitted indicating
no redaction
necessary
UNSEALED
Not narrowly tailored
to confidential
business information
UNSEALED
Not narrowly tailored
to confidential
business information
UNSEALED
Declaration
submitted indicating
no redaction
necessary
7
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
1
540
2
3
540
4
5
6
541
7
8
541
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
541
12
13
14
541
15
16
17
541
18
19
20
541
21
22
23
541
24
25
26
27
28
541
Exhibit 20 to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Motion For
Leave to Amend Its
Invalidity Contentions
Exhibit 22 to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Motion For
Leave to Amend Its
Invalidity Contentions
Samsung’s Motion To
Preclude Apple
From Asserting Untimely
Dates Of Conception
Exhibit C to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Motion To
Preclude Apple From
Asserting Untimely Dates
Of Conception
Exhibit D to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Motion To
Preclude Apple From
Asserting Untimely Dates
Of Conception
Exhibit E to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Motion To
Preclude Apple From
Asserting Untimely Dates
Of Conception
Exhibit F to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Motion To
Preclude Apple From
Asserting Untimely Dates
Of Conception
Exhibit G to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Motion To
Preclude Apple From
Asserting Untimely Dates
Of Conception
Exhibit H to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Motion To
Preclude Apple From
Asserting Untimely Dates
Of Conception
Exhibit I to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Motion To
Preclude Apple From
Asserting Untimely Dates
SEALED as amended by Docket
No. 657
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED as amended by Docket
No. 657
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
8
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
1
541
2
3
4
541
5
6
7
561
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
563
11
12
563
13
14
15
563
16
17
18
563
19
20
21
563
22
23
24
577
25
26
27
28
577
Of Conception
Exhibit J to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Motion To
Preclude Apple From
Asserting Untimely Dates
Of Conception
Exhibit K to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Motion To
Preclude Apple From
Asserting Untimely Dates
Of Conception
Exhibit A to the
Declaration of Amar
Thakur ISO Samsung’s
Reply On Its MTC
Documents From Related
Litigations
Samsung’s Reply ISO
Motion to Compel
Complete Production of
Source Code
Thakur Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Reply ISO
Motion to Compel
Complete Production of
Source Code
Exhibit 3 to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Reply ISO
Motion to Compel
Complete Production of
Source Code
Exhibit 4 to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Reply ISO
Motion to Compel
Complete Production of
Source Code
Exhibit 10 to Thakur
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Reply ISO
Motion to Compel
Complete Production of
Source Code
Samsung’s Supplemental
Brief ISO Samsung's
Motion to Amend
Invalidity Contentions
Briggs Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Supplemental
Brief ISO Samsung's
Motion to Amend
Invalidity Contentions
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
SEALED as amended by Docket
No. 586
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED as amended by Docket
No. 587-1
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED as amended by Docket
No. 587-2
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED as amended by Docket
No. 587-3
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
UNSEALED except last 3 pages, Public information
which remain SEALED
SEALED as amended by Docket
No. 587-4
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
UNSEALED
Declaration
submitted indicating
no redaction
necessary
Declaration
submitted indicating
no redaction
necessary
UNSEALED
9
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
1
577
2
3
4
577
5
6
7
577
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
577
11
12
13
582
14
15
592
16
17
18
592
19
20
21
592
22
23
24
593
25
26
27
28
613
Exhibit 1 to Briggs
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Supplemental
Brief ISO Samsung's
Motion to Amend
Invalidity Contentions
Exhibit 2 to Briggs
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Supplemental
Brief ISO Samsung's
Motion to Amend
Invalidity Contentions
Exhibit 3 to Briggs
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Supplemental
Brief ISO Samsung's
Motion to Amend
Invalidity Contentions
Exhibit 4 to Briggs
Declaration ISO
Samsung’s Supplemental
Brief ISO Samsung's
Motion to Amend
Invalidity Contentions
Apple's Opposition to
Samsung's Motion for
Leave to File Supplemental
Briefing
Exhibit 2 to Supplemental
Furman Declaration ISO
Samsung's Motion for
Leave to Amend and
Supplement Its
Infringement Contentions
Exhibit 3 to Supplemental
Furman Declaration ISO
Samsung's Motion for
Leave to Amend and
Supplement Its
Infringement Contentions
Exhibit 4 to Supplemental
Furman Declaration ISO
Samsung's Motion for
Leave to Amend and
Supplement Its
Infringement Contentions
Exhibits B and L to the
Declaration of Brian
Buroker ISO Apple's
Opposition to Samsung's
Motion to Preclude Apple
From Asserting Untimely
Dates of Conception
Samsung's Reply in
Support of its Motion for
UNSEALED
Defended solely on
attorney-client
privilege grounds;
privilege waived by
production
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
UNSEALED
Defended solely on
attorney-client
privilege grounds;
privilege waived by
production
UNSEALED
Defended solely on
attorney-client
privilege grounds;
privilege waived by
production
UNSEALED
Declaration
submitted indicating
no redaction
necessary
Not narrowly tailored
to confidential
business information
UNSEALED
UNSEALED
Not narrowly tailored
to confidential
business information
UNSEALED
Not moved under seal
UNSEALED
Declaration
submitted indicating
no redaction
necessary
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
10
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
1
2
632
3
Leave to Amend Invalidity
Contentions
Samsung’s Motion to
Compel Production of
Documents and Response
to Interrogatory No 32
4
5
6
632
7
8
9
632
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
632
12
13
14
632
15
16
Exhibit 4 to Samsung’s
Motion to Compel
Production of Documents
and Response to
Interrogatory No 32
Exhibit 12 to Samsung’s
Motion to Compel
Production of Documents
and Response to
Interrogatory No 32
Exhibit 25 to Samsung’s
Motion to Compel
Production of Documents
and Response to
Interrogatory No 32
Exhibit 26 to Samsung’s
Motion to Compel
Production of Documents
and Response to
Interrogatory No 32
17
SEALED
12:1-13: 1
13:7
14:6-7
14:17-20
UNSEALED
6:1-25
13:5-6
13:8-9
14: 2-6
14:7-8
14: 14-17
14:20-25
15:1-25
SEALED as amended by Docket
No. 655-2
Sealed portions
reflect narrow
tailoring to protect
confidential business
information.
Unsealed portions do
not.
SEALED as amended by Docket
No. 655-3
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
13: 5-8
20:19-21:8
21:25-22:1
22:22
32:6-7
33: 3-4
18
19
20
21
632
22
23
632
24
25
26
27
28
632
Exhibit 31 to Samsung’s
Motion to Compel
Production of Documents
and Response to
Interrogatory No 32
Exhibit 32 to Samsung’s
Motion to Compel
Production of Documents
and Response to
Interrogatory No 32
Exhibit 33 to Samsung’s
Motion to Compel
Production of Documents
and Response to
Interrogatory No 32
SEALED
Sealed portions
reflect narrow
tailoring to protect
confidential business
information.
Unsealed portions do
not.
Page numbers varied
between versions.
For purposes of this
order, pg. 12
correlates to pg. 67 of
deposition testimony.
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
11
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
UNSEALED
12:1-25
13:1-4, 9-25
14:1-20:8
20: 9-12
21: 10-24
22: 2-21
22:23-31:25
32: 1-12
33: 6-25
34: 1-25
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
1
632
Exhibit 34 to Samsung’s
Motion to Compel
Production of Documents
and Response to
Interrogatory No 32
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
632
Exhibit 35 to Samsung’s
Motion to Compel
Production of Documents
and Response to
Interrogatory No 32
Exhibit 36 to Samsung’s
Motion to Compel
Production of Documents
and Response to
Interrogatory No 32
CORRECTED Exhibit A
to Stipulation re Samsungs
Proposed Invalidity
Contentions
Exhibit 2 to Michael
Valek’s Declaration ISO
Apple Inc.'s Opposition to
Google Inc.'s Motion to
Quash Apple's Subpoenas
for the Production of
Documents and Testimony
Exhibit 13 to Shannon
Mader’s Declaration ISO
Apple Inc.'s Opposition to
Google Inc.'s Motion to
Quash Apple's Subpoenas
for the Production of
Documents and Testimony
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
UNSEALED except pg. 12
(deposition transcript pg. 111),
which shall remain SEALED
Public information
UNSEALED
No declaration filed
UNSEALED
Public information
SEALED as follows: 10:2, 10:
21, 11: 1, 12: 4, 12: 25-27.
Remainder UNSEALED
Sealed portions
reflect narrow
tailoring to protect
confidential business
information.
Unsealed portions do
not.
Samsung's Motion to
Compel Production of
Financial Documents and
to Enforce the April 12,
2013 Order
Thakur Declaration ISO
Samsung's Motion to
Compel Production of
Financial Documents and
to Enforce the April 12,
2013 Order
Exhibit 5 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 6 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
UNSEALED
Public information
UNSEALED
Public information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
2
3
4
5
6
632
7
8
9
649
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
656
12
13
14
656
15
16
17
18
669
19
20
21
669
22
23
24
669
25
26
27
28
669
12
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
1
2
669
3
4
5
669
6
7
8
669
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
669
12
13
14
669
15
16
17
669
18
19
20
669
21
22
23
669
24
25
26
27
28
669
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 7 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 8 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 9 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 10 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 11 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 12 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 13 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 14 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 15 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
UNSEALED
Not marked
confidential, and
public information
UNSEALED
Not marked
confidential, and
public information
UNSEALED
Not marked
confidential, and
public information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
13
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
1
2
669
3
4
5
669
6
7
8
669
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
669
12
13
14
669
15
16
17
669
18
19
20
669
21
22
23
669
24
25
26
27
28
669
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 16 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 17 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 18 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 19 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 20 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 21 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 22 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 23 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 24 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
14
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
1
669
2
3
4
676
5
6
the April 12, 2013 Order
Exhibit 25 to Thakur
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Financial
Documents and to Enforce
the April 12, 2013 Order
Apple's Opposition to
Samsung's Motion to
Compel Production of
Documents and Response
to Interrogatory No. 32
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
Pgs. 3, 13: SEALED
Remainder: UNSEALED
Sealed portions
reflect narrow
tailoring to protect
confidential business
information.
Unsealed portions do
not.
No declaration
submitted
7
8
676
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
676
12
13
14
676
15
16
17
18
19
681
689
20
21
22
689
23
24
25
26
27
28
689
Walden Declaration ISO
Apple's Opposition to
Samsung's Motion to
Compel Production of
Documents and Response
to Interrogatory No. 32
Exhibit A to Walden
Declaration ISO Apple's
Opposition to Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Documents
and Response to
Interrogatory No. 32
Exhibit B to Walden
Declaration ISO Apple's
Opposition to Samsung's
Motion to Compel
Production of Documents
and Response to
Interrogatory No. 32
Apple’s Amended
Infringement Contentions
UNSEALED
Samsung's Reply in
Support of Its Motion to
Compel Production of
Documents and Response
to Interrogatory No. 32
Drezdzon’s Declaration
ISO Samsung's Reply in
Support of Its Motion to
Compel Production of
Documents and Response
to Interrogatory No. 32
Exhibit 37 to Drezdzon’s
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Reply in Support of Its
Motion to Compel
Production of Documents
and Response to
Interrogatory No. 32
UNSEALED
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
UNSEALED
No declaration
submitted
UNSEALED
Not narrowly tailored
to confidential
business information
No declaration
submitted
UNSEALED
No declaration
submitted
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
15
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
1
689
2
3
4
689
5
6
7
8
689
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
711
12
13
14
721
15
16
738
17
18
742
19
20
21
743
Exhibit 38 to Drezdzon’s
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Reply in Support of Its
Motion to Compel
Production of Documents
and Response to
Interrogatory No. 32
Exhibit 39 to Drezdzon’s
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Reply in Support of Its
Motion to Compel
Production of Documents
and Response to
Interrogatory No. 32
Exhibit 40 to Drezdzon’s
Declaration ISO Samsung's
Reply in Support of Its
Motion to Compel
Production of Documents
and Response to
Interrogatory No. 32
Apple's Opposition to
Samsung's Motion to
Compel Production of
Financial Documents and
to Enforce the April 12,
2013 Order
Samsung's Reply In
Support of Motion to
Compel Financial
Documents and Exhibits
Apple’s Notice of Joinder
in Nokia’s Motion for a
Protective Order
Stipulation With Proposed
Order Re Motion For
Protective Order By Nokia
Corporation
Samsung’s Opposition to
Apple’s Notice of Joinder
in Nokia’s Motion for a
Protective Order
SEALED as amended by Docket
No. 702
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED as amended by Docket
No. 702
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
SEALED
Narrowly tailored to
confidential business
information
UNSEALED
Public information
UNSEALED
Public information
UNSEALED
Public information
UNSEALED
Public information
UNSEALED
Public information
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
Dated: March 7, 2014
25
_________________________________
26
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
27
28
16
Case No.: 5:12-cv-0630-LHK-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?