Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
1541
Order on Samsung's Objections to Apple's Opening Exhibits. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 3/29/2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
)
)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
)
corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S
OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S OPENING
EXHIBITS
This order addresses Samsung’s objections to exhibits to be used during Apple’s Opening
21
22
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
Statement. ECF Nos. 1516-3, 1517-3. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record
in the case, and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court
rules on Samsung’s objections as follows:
SAMSUNG’S
OBJECTION
J
K
L
COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION
Overruled.
Sustained as to explicit discussion of “auto correct” in the iPhone. Overruled as
to the remainder. Apple must make conforming redactions.
Overruled.
1
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S OPENING EXHIBITS
1
2
M
N.3
N.4
Overruled.
Overruled.
Sustained as to page 82 (SAMNDCA630_04335797) of PX 183. Overruled as
to all other exhibits and pages.
3
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 29, 2014
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S OPENING EXHIBITS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?