Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 1541

Order on Samsung's Objections to Apple's Opening Exhibits. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 3/29/2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) ) Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, ) ) v. ) ) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a ) Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York ) ) corporation; and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, ) ) a Delaware limited liability company, ) Defendants and Counterclaimants. ) ) APPLE, INC., a California corporation, 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S OPENING EXHIBITS This order addresses Samsung’s objections to exhibits to be used during Apple’s Opening 21 22 Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK Statement. ECF Nos. 1516-3, 1517-3. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case, and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on Samsung’s objections as follows: SAMSUNG’S OBJECTION J K L COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION Overruled. Sustained as to explicit discussion of “auto correct” in the iPhone. Overruled as to the remainder. Apple must make conforming redactions. Overruled. 1 Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S OPENING EXHIBITS 1 2 M N.3 N.4 Overruled. Overruled. Sustained as to page 82 (SAMNDCA630_04335797) of PX 183. Overruled as to all other exhibits and pages. 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 29, 2014 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S OPENING EXHIBITS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?