Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
1548
ORDER ON PRETRIAL ITEMS. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 3/30/14. (lhklc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; and SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)
21
•
ORDER ON PRETRIAL ITEMS
It is hereby ORDERED that:
22
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
Samsung’s objection to Apple’s proposed version of the Federal Judicial Center
23
instructional video (ECF No. 1534) is overruled. The parties shall bring the November
24
2013 version of the video, “The Patent Process: An Overview for Jurors,” and shall
25
include the handout referenced in the video in the jury binders.
26
•
The parties shall bring 150 (not 75) copies of the Corrected Joint List of Witnesses,
27
Deponents, Attorneys and Law Firms (ECF No. 1529) prior to jury selection on March
28
31, 2014.
1
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON PRETRIAL ITEMS
1
•
By April 1, 2014, the parties shall file revised Joint Proposed Final Jury Instructions to
2
address any changes in response to the Court’s Orders in ECF Nos. 1532 and 1535,
3
including a redline to the version of the Joint Proposed Final Jury Instructions at ECF
4
No. 1458.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: March 30, 2014
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON PRETRIAL ITEMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?