Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 1548

ORDER ON PRETRIAL ITEMS. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 3/30/14. (lhklc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 APPLE, INC., a California corporation, ) ) Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, ) ) v. ) ) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a ) Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ) ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York ) corporation; and SAMSUNG ) TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, ) a Delaware limited liability company, ) ) Defendants and Counterclaimants. ) ) 21 • ORDER ON PRETRIAL ITEMS It is hereby ORDERED that: 22 Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK Samsung’s objection to Apple’s proposed version of the Federal Judicial Center 23 instructional video (ECF No. 1534) is overruled. The parties shall bring the November 24 2013 version of the video, “The Patent Process: An Overview for Jurors,” and shall 25 include the handout referenced in the video in the jury binders. 26 • The parties shall bring 150 (not 75) copies of the Corrected Joint List of Witnesses, 27 Deponents, Attorneys and Law Firms (ECF No. 1529) prior to jury selection on March 28 31, 2014. 1 Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK ORDER ON PRETRIAL ITEMS 1 • By April 1, 2014, the parties shall file revised Joint Proposed Final Jury Instructions to 2 address any changes in response to the Court’s Orders in ECF Nos. 1532 and 1535, 3 including a redline to the version of the Joint Proposed Final Jury Instructions at ECF 4 No. 1458. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: March 30, 2014 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK ORDER ON PRETRIAL ITEMS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?