Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 1572

ORDER ON SAMSUNG'S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE'S DISCLOSURES RE 1563-3. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/3/2014. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

)
)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
)
corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,

ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S
OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S
DISCLOSURES

Samsung has filed objections to Apple’s disclosures. ECF No. 1563-3. Apple has filed a
response. ECF No. 1564. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case,
and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on
Samsung’s objections as follows:
Exhibit
Number
PX 109

27
28

Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK

PX 106
Witness

COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION
Sustained. While Mr. Deniau may testify about his work on “data detectors,” he
may not provide any opinion specifically about whether Apple practices the ‘647.
Overruled.
Overruled.

1
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES

1
2

objection
regarding
scope of ‘647
(Dr. Miller)

3
4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 3, 2014

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES