Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
1572
ORDER ON SAMSUNG'S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE'S DISCLOSURES RE 1563-3. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/3/2014. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
)
)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
)
corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S
OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S
DISCLOSURES
Samsung has filed objections to Apple’s disclosures. ECF No. 1563-3. Apple has filed a
response. ECF No. 1564. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case,
and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on
Samsung’s objections as follows:
Exhibit
Number
PX 109
27
28
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
PX 106
Witness
COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION
Sustained. While Mr. Deniau may testify about his work on “data detectors,” he
may not provide any opinion specifically about whether Apple practices the ‘647.
Overruled.
Overruled.
1
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES
1
2
objection
regarding
scope of ‘647
(Dr. Miller)
3
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 3, 2014
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?