Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 1573

ORDER ON APPLE'S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG'S DISCLOSURES. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/3/14. (lhklc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

APPLE, INC., a California corporation,

)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; and SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)

Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO
SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES

On April 2, 2014, Apple filed objections to Samsung’s disclosures ECF No. 1564. On
April 2, 2014, Samsung filed a response. ECF No. 1563-3. After reviewing the parties’ briefing,
considering the record in the case, and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of
Evidence 403, the Court rules on Apple’s objections as follows:
APPLE’S
OBJECTION
B. James
Miller
DX338
DX339

COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION

Overruled, subject to Samsung laying foundation.
Overruled. Samsung has not asserted inequitable conduct as to the ’647 patent.
Questions related solely to inequitable conduct will not be permitted pursuant to

1
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES

1

SDX2326

Fed. R. Evid. 403.
Sustained.

2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

Dated: April 3, 2014

5

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES