Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 1619

ORDER ON SAMSUNG'S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE'S DISCLOSURES RE 1605-1. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/7/2014. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

)
)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
)
corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,

Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S
OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S
DISCLOSURES

Samsung has filed objections to Apple’s disclosures. ECF No. 1605-1. Apple has filed a
response. ECF No. 1600-3. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case,
and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on
Samsung’s objections as follows:
Exhibit
Number
PDX93.10
PDX93.11
PX146

COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION
Overruled.
Overruled.
Sustained in part and overruled in part. Dr. Vellturo may discuss this exhibit but
he may not give any opinion regarding whether Samsung copied Apple.

1
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

PDX92.22

Sustained.

Samsung also requests to seal various documents. ECF No. 1605-1. Having considered
Samsung’s motion, and compelling reasons having been shown, the Court seals the following
documents as follows:
Exhibit and
pages
requested to
be sealed
PX 142 in its
entirety
PX 158 in its
entirety
PX 160 in its
entirety
PX 161: pages
1, 7-18
PX 162 in its
entirety
PX 208: pages
1-4
PX 222 in its
entirety
PX 222A in its
entirety
PX 223 in its
entirety
PX 223A in its
entirety
DX 431: page
6
PX 154: pages
5, 9, 10
PX 226 in its
entirety
DX 432 (pages
not used during
an
examination)

DX 433: Page
17 and pages
not used during
an

COURT’S RULING ON SEALING REQUEST

GRANTED except for page 1 which is the cover page.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED. 
DENIED. Apple has replaced this exhibit with PX 222A. 
GRANTED as to pages 11, 13, 15, 17, 21, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 39, 41, and 42.
DENIED as to the rest of the exhibit.
DENIED. Apple has replaced this exhibit with PX 223A.
GRANTED as to pages 5-8, 11-14, 17-20, 23-26, 29-32, and 59-63. DENIED as
to the rest of the exhibit.
GRANTED. 
GRANTED.
GRANTED. 
DENIED without prejudice. Samsung’s requests to seal “pages not used during
an examination” are overbroad. From now on, the parties must explicitly state
what pages they request be sealed during a witness examination, or the sealing
request will not be granted. Samsung can refile these sealing requests (the ones
for which Samsung asked that all “pages not used during an examination” be
sealed) by 8:00 p.m. April 7, 2014.
GRANTED as to page 17, DENIED without prejudice as to rest of exhibit.

2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

examination.
DX 434: pages
not used during
an examination
DX 435: pages
not used during
an examination
DX 436: pages
not used during
an examination
DX 437: pages
not used during
an examination
DX 438: pages
not used during
an examination
DX 439: pages
not used during
an examination
PX 217: pages
not used during
an examination
PX 182: pages
not used during
an examination
PX 185: pages
not used during
an examination

DENIED without prejudice.

DENIED without prejudice.

DENIED without prejudice.

DENIED without prejudice.

DENIED without prejudice.

DENIED without prejudice.

DENIED without prejudice.

DENIED without prejudice.

DENIED without prejudice.

17
18
19
20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 7, 2014

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES