Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
1650
ORDER REMOVING EXHIBIT RE: 1648. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/9/14. (lhklc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 12-cv-00630-LHK-PSG
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNGS MOTION TO WITHDRAW
EXHIBIT B TO FAZIO DECLARATION
IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S HIGH
PRIORITY OBJECTIONS [DKT. NO.
1639-6] FROM THE COURT’S
ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM
Defendants.
19
20
On April 9, 2014, Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics
21
22
23
America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) filed
Samsung’s High Priority Objections And Responses And Demonstratives Disclosed For Bonura,
Clark, Hackborn, Lockheimer, And Sohn (“HPO Brief”) [Dkt. No. 1639-3].
24
On April 9, 2014, Samsung filed a motion to withdraw Exhibit B to the Fazio Declaration
25
26
27
In Support of Samsung’s HPO Brief.
Having reviewed the motion, for good cause shown, Samsung’s Motion to Withdraw
Samsung’s Motion to Withdraw Exhibit B to the Fazio Declaration In Support of Samsung’s HPO
28
Case No. 12-cv-00630-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNGS MOTION TO WITHDRAW EXHIBIT B
-1-
1 Brief is GRANTED, and the Court ORDERS that Exhibit B to the Fazio Declaration, filed at Dkt.
2 No. 1639-6, shall be immediately removed from ECF.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6 DATED:
April 9, 2014
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 12-cv-00630-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNGS MOTION TO WITHDRAW EXHIBIT B
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?