Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 1650

ORDER REMOVING EXHIBIT RE: 1648. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/9/14. (lhklc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 12-cv-00630-LHK-PSG 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a 15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New 16 York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, 17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNGS MOTION TO WITHDRAW EXHIBIT B TO FAZIO DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S HIGH PRIORITY OBJECTIONS [DKT. NO. 1639-6] FROM THE COURT’S ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM Defendants. 19 20 On April 9, 2014, Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics 21 22 23 America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) filed Samsung’s High Priority Objections And Responses And Demonstratives Disclosed For Bonura, Clark, Hackborn, Lockheimer, And Sohn (“HPO Brief”) [Dkt. No. 1639-3]. 24 On April 9, 2014, Samsung filed a motion to withdraw Exhibit B to the Fazio Declaration 25 26 27 In Support of Samsung’s HPO Brief. Having reviewed the motion, for good cause shown, Samsung’s Motion to Withdraw Samsung’s Motion to Withdraw Exhibit B to the Fazio Declaration In Support of Samsung’s HPO 28 Case No. 12-cv-00630-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNGS MOTION TO WITHDRAW EXHIBIT B -1- 1 Brief is GRANTED, and the Court ORDERS that Exhibit B to the Fazio Declaration, filed at Dkt. 2 No. 1639-6, shall be immediately removed from ECF. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 DATED: April 9, 2014 The Honorable Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 12-cv-00630-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNGS MOTION TO WITHDRAW EXHIBIT B -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?