Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
1654
ORDER RE APPLE'S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG'S DISCLOSURES RE 1637-3. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/10/2014. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
)
)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
)
corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO
SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES
Apple has filed objections to Samsung’s disclosures. ECF No. 1637-3. Samsung has filed a
response. ECF No. 1639-3. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case,
and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on
Apple’s objections as follows:
Apple
Objection
THOMAS
BONURA
12/11/12 Dep.
Tr. at 93:21-
COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION
Overruled.
1
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
93:24, 94:294:5, 94:1294:17, 168:3168:16, 168:20168:25, 169:2169:5, 169:8169:9
12/11/12 Dep.
Overruled.
Tr. at at 99:22100:4, 100:7100:18, 103:6105:11, 105:1415, 107:5108:10, 108:13108:16, 108:18108:22
12/11/12 Dep.
Overruled.
Tr. at 70:970:11, 70:1370:22
HIROSHI
LOCKHEIMER
Scope of this
Sustained.
witness’
testimony
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
Dated: April 10, 2014
18
19
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?