Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 1680

ORDER RE SAMSUNG'S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE'S DISCLOSURES RE 1668-3.. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/13/2014. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, ) ) v. ) ) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a ) Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York ) ) corporation; and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, ) ) a Delaware limited liability company, ) Defendants and Counterclaimants. ) ) APPLE, INC., a California corporation, Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES Samsung has filed objections to Apple’s disclosures. ECF No. 1668-3. Apple has filed a response. ECF No. 1666-3. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case, and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on Samsung’s objections as follows: Exhibit Number PX 227 PX 268 COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION Overruled. Overruled. However, Apple must redact the paragraph about patent litigation with Apple and the paragraph about gas leaks and explosions at Samsung’s factories. 1 Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES 1 2 3 “Samsung Uneasy in the Lead” Article Sustained. Samsung also requests to seal various documents. ECF No. 1668-3. Having considered 4 Samsung’s motion, and compelling reasons having been shown, the Court seals the following 5 documents as follows: 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 Exhibit and pages requested to be sealed PX 154 pages 2-4 PX 202 pages 13 and 14 PX 203 pages 4, 9-16, 19-21, 23-25, 28-33, 36-38 JX 51B COURT’S RULING ON SEALING REQUEST GRANTED. GRANTED. GRANTED. GRANTED as to Google’s highly confidential and proprietary source code (GOOG-NDCAL630-S-00007768 through GOOG-NDCAL630-S-00007773; GOOG-NDCAL630-S-00007774) per Google’s declaration (see ECF No. 1675); DENIED as to the remainder of the document. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: April 13, 2014 19 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?