Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
1680
ORDER RE SAMSUNG'S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE'S DISCLOSURES RE 1668-3.. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/13/2014. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
)
)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
)
corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S
OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S
DISCLOSURES
Samsung has filed objections to Apple’s disclosures. ECF No. 1668-3. Apple has filed a
response. ECF No. 1666-3. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case,
and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on
Samsung’s objections as follows:
Exhibit
Number
PX 227
PX 268
COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION
Overruled.
Overruled. However, Apple must redact the paragraph about patent litigation
with Apple and the paragraph about gas leaks and explosions at Samsung’s
factories.
1
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES
1
2
3
“Samsung
Uneasy in the
Lead” Article
Sustained.
Samsung also requests to seal various documents. ECF No. 1668-3. Having considered
4
Samsung’s motion, and compelling reasons having been shown, the Court seals the following
5
documents as follows:
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
Exhibit and
pages
requested to
be sealed
PX 154 pages
2-4
PX 202 pages
13 and 14
PX 203 pages
4, 9-16, 19-21,
23-25, 28-33,
36-38
JX 51B
COURT’S RULING ON SEALING REQUEST
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED as to Google’s highly confidential and proprietary source code
(GOOG-NDCAL630-S-00007768 through GOOG-NDCAL630-S-00007773;
GOOG-NDCAL630-S-00007774) per Google’s declaration (see ECF No. 1675);
DENIED as to the remainder of the document.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
Dated: April 13, 2014
19
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?