Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 1690

ORDER RE SAMSUNG'S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE'S DISCLOSURES IN CONNECTION WITH JUSTIN DENISON RE: 1673-3. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/14/14. (lhklc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

APPLE, INC., a California corporation,

)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; and SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)

Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S
OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S
DISCLOSURES IN CONNECTION
WITH JUSTIN DENISON

On April 13, 2014, Samsung filed objections to Apple’s disclosures in connection with
Justin Denison. ECF No. 1673-3. On April 13, 2014, Apple filed a response. ECF No. 1672-3.
After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case, and balancing the
considerations set forth in Fed. R. Evid. 403, the Court rules on Samsung’s objections as follows:
SAMSUNG OBJECTION
A. Justin Denison
WSJ, “Samsung Tweaks
How it Calculates
Marketing Costs”

COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION
Overruled. The document may be used solely for refreshing
recollection, but will not be admitted as an exhibit or presented
to the jury.
1

Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES IN CONNECTION WITH JUSTIN
DENISON

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2

Dated: April 14, 2014

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES IN CONNECTION WITH JUSTIN
DENISON