Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
1691
ORDER RE APPLE'S SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTION TO SAMSUNG'S DISCLOSURES IN CONNECTION WITH YOUNGMI KIM RE: 1689. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/14/2014. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
)
)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
)
corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S
SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTION TO
SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES IN
CONNECTION WITH YOUNGMI KIM
Apple has filed a supplemental objection to Samsung’s disclosures in connection with
Youngmi Kim. ECF No. 1689. Samsung has filed a response. ECF No. 1688-2. After reviewing the
parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case, and balancing the considerations set forth in
Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on Apple’s objection as follows:
Exhibit
COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION
Number
Youngmi Kim
SDX2462
Sustained.
(video
1
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES IN CONNECTION WITH YOUNGMI
KIM
1
2
3
4
5
6
demonstrative
about Android
notification
center)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 14, 2014
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES IN CONNECTION WITH YOUNGMI
KIM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?