Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 1699

ORDER RE (1) SAMSUNG'S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE'S DISCLOSURES IN CONNECTION WITH SAUL GREENBERG AND KEVIN JEFFAY, AND (2) SAMSUNG'S SEALING REQUESTS RE: 1673-3. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/14/14. (lhklc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

APPLE, INC., a California corporation,

)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; and SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)

Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER RE (1) SAMSUNG’S
OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S
DISCLOSURES IN CONNECTION
WITH SAUL GREENBERG AND
KEVIN JEFFAY, AND (2) SAMSUNG’S
SEALING REQUESTS

On April 13, 2014, Samsung filed objections to Apple’s disclosures. ECF No. 1673-3. On
April 13, 2014, Apple filed a response. ECF No. 1672-3. The Court separately addressed
Samsung’s objections in connection with Justin Denison. ECF No. 1690. After reviewing the
parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case, and balancing the considerations set forth in
Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on Samsung’s objections as follows:
SAMSUNG OBJECTION
C. Saul Greenberg
1846 Trial Tr. at 795-796
(1846 ECF No. 1610)

COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION
Sustained. The cited pages do not contain the testimony about
Samsung product code names that Apple has described.
1

Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER RE (1) SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES IN CONNECTION WITH SAUL
GREENBERG AND KEVIN JEFFAY, AND (2) SAMSUNG’S SEALING REQUESTS

1
2
3
4
5
6

D. Kevin Jeffay
DX345 (iPhone 5 running
iOS 7)
4/26/2012 Cohen Decl.
F. Daniel Wigdor
Summary Judgment Order
(ECF No. 1150) and Joint
Stip. and Order (ECF No.
1416)

Overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.

Samsung also requests to seal various documents. ECF Nos. 1673-3, 1673-14, 1686.

7

Having considered Samsung’s requests, and compelling reasons having been shown, the Court

8

seals the following documents as follows:

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15

Exhibit and pages
requested to be sealed
PX201, pages 60, 72, 87
PX216, pages 5, 6, 8
PX200, pages 6, 8, 9, 12,
22-39, 42-51, 53-68, 83-91,
95-112, 114-119, 121-130,
133-136, 139-147, 149-168,
171-179, 181-188
JX50B
JX50C

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

SDX2570
JX51B
JX51C: (GOOGNDCAL630-S-00008752
through GOOGNDCAL630-S-00008759;
GOOG-NDCAL630-S00006072 through GOOGNDCAL630-S-00006079;
GOOG-NDCAL630-S00006547 through GOOGNDCAL630-S-00006551)
DX314: pages
MSFT_CODE000170 to
MSFT_CODE003225
DX316

COURT’S RULING ON SEALING REQUEST
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.

DENIED without prejudice. Samsung must identify Bates
ranges that require sealing by 10:00 P.M., April 14, 2014. See
ECF No. 1680 at 2.
DENIED without prejudice. Samsung must identify Bates
ranges that require sealing by 10:00 P.M., April 14, 2014. See
ECF No. 1680 at 2.
GRANTED.
Already granted (ECF No. 1680 at 2).
GRANTED as to Google’s highly confidential and proprietary
source code (GOOG-NDCAL630-S-00008752 through GOOGNDCAL630-S-00008759; GOOG-NDCAL630-S-00006072
through GOOG-NDCAL630-S-00006079; GOOG-NDCAL630S-00006547 through GOOG-NDCAL630-S-00006551) per
Google’s declaration (see ECF No. 1686).
DENIED as to the remainder of the document.
GRANTED, subject to Microsoft filing a supporting declaration
by 8:00 A.M., April 15, 2014.
GRANTED.

Samsung also requests to read or otherwise enter into the record Apple’s Supplemental
Responses to Samsung’s First Set of Requests for Admission to Apple Inc. (Nos. 1-7), Request
Nos. 1-7. ECF No. 1684. After reviewing the parties’ cited authorities, considering the record in
2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER RE (1) SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES IN CONNECTION WITH SAUL
GREENBERG AND KEVIN JEFFAY, AND (2) SAMSUNG’S SEALING REQUESTS

1

the case, and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court

2

DENIES Samsung’s request.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

Dated: April 14, 2014

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER RE (1) SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S DISCLOSURES IN CONNECTION WITH SAUL
GREENBERG AND KEVIN JEFFAY, AND (2) SAMSUNG’S SEALING REQUESTS