Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 1730

ORDER RE APPLE'S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG'S DISCLOSURES RE 1727-3. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/19/2014. (lhklc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

)
)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
)
corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,

Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO
SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES

Apple has filed objections to Samsung’s disclosures. ECF No. 1727-3. Samsung has filed a
response. ECF No. 1726-3. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case,
and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on
Apple’s objections as follows:
Exhibit
Number
Judith
Chevalier
SDX 3786
Jong Pil Hong

COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION

SUSTAINED.

1
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

7/4/2013 Depo
at 47.
James Kearl
DX 390
DX 396
Ken Parulski
Witness
Objection
SDX 3705
SDX 3706
Dan Schonfeld
SDX 3994
SDX 3995
SDX 3996

OVERRULED. Because Samsung’s objection is overruled, Apple’s objection is
overruled.

OVERRULED.
SUSTAINED.
OVERRULED.
OVERRULED.
OVERRULED.
SUSTAINED.
OVERRULED.
SUSTAINED.

Apple also requests to seal various documents. ECF No. 1727-3. Having considered
Apple’s motion, and compelling reasons having been shown, the Court seals the following
documents as follows:

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Exhibit
JX 52
PX 257
PX 294
PX 295
PX 298
DX 351
DX 352
DX 353
DX 354
DX 371
DX 491
DX 499
SDX 3721-24
SDX 3728-30

22
23

SDX 3733

24
25

SDX 3737-38

26
27
28

SDX 3741-42

COURT’S RULING ON SEALING REQUEST
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted
these demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by
4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted
these demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by
4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted
these demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by
4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted
these demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by
4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.

2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES

1
2

SDX 3750

SDX 3977-79

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

SDX 3981-86

SDX 3990-92
SDX 3993,
3997-4001. 
SDX 3994-96
DX 390
DX 391A

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15

DX 399
DX 402
DX 453A,
pages 5 and 6
PDX 102.1102.2
SDX 3784

16
17
18
19

SDX 3805
SDX 3807
SDX 3935

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted
these demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by
4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.
GRANTED.

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted
these demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by
4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.
GRANTED.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted this
demonstrative for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by 4:45p.m.
April 19, 2014.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted this
demonstrative for the Court’s review. The Court only has a copy of DX 391.
Apple will file this exhibit by 4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.
GRANTED, except pages 1 and 69 (cover page and last page) are not sealable.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple has not submitted these
demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by 4:45p.m.
April 19, 2014.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted
these demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by
4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted
these demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by
4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22

Dated: April 19, 2014

23

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES