Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
1730
ORDER RE APPLE'S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG'S DISCLOSURES RE 1727-3. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/19/2014. (lhklc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
)
)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
)
corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO
SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES
Apple has filed objections to Samsung’s disclosures. ECF No. 1727-3. Samsung has filed a
response. ECF No. 1726-3. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case,
and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on
Apple’s objections as follows:
Exhibit
Number
Judith
Chevalier
SDX 3786
Jong Pil Hong
COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION
SUSTAINED.
1
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
7/4/2013 Depo
at 47.
James Kearl
DX 390
DX 396
Ken Parulski
Witness
Objection
SDX 3705
SDX 3706
Dan Schonfeld
SDX 3994
SDX 3995
SDX 3996
OVERRULED. Because Samsung’s objection is overruled, Apple’s objection is
overruled.
OVERRULED.
SUSTAINED.
OVERRULED.
OVERRULED.
OVERRULED.
SUSTAINED.
OVERRULED.
SUSTAINED.
Apple also requests to seal various documents. ECF No. 1727-3. Having considered
Apple’s motion, and compelling reasons having been shown, the Court seals the following
documents as follows:
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Exhibit
JX 52
PX 257
PX 294
PX 295
PX 298
DX 351
DX 352
DX 353
DX 354
DX 371
DX 491
DX 499
SDX 3721-24
SDX 3728-30
22
23
SDX 3733
24
25
SDX 3737-38
26
27
28
SDX 3741-42
COURT’S RULING ON SEALING REQUEST
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted
these demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by
4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted
these demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by
4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted
these demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by
4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted
these demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by
4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.
2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES
1
2
SDX 3750
SDX 3977-79
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SDX 3981-86
SDX 3990-92
SDX 3993,
3997-4001.
SDX 3994-96
DX 390
DX 391A
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
DX 399
DX 402
DX 453A,
pages 5 and 6
PDX 102.1102.2
SDX 3784
16
17
18
19
SDX 3805
SDX 3807
SDX 3935
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted
these demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by
4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.
GRANTED.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted
these demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by
4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.
GRANTED.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted this
demonstrative for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by 4:45p.m.
April 19, 2014.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted this
demonstrative for the Court’s review. The Court only has a copy of DX 391.
Apple will file this exhibit by 4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.
GRANTED, except pages 1 and 69 (cover page and last page) are not sealable.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple has not submitted these
demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by 4:45p.m.
April 19, 2014.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted
these demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by
4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Apple and Samsung have not submitted
these demonstratives for the Court’s review. Apple will file these slides by
4:45p.m. April 19, 2014.
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
Dated: April 19, 2014
23
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S DISCLOSURES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?