Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 1812

Verdict Form [Amended Tentative]. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 04/25/2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

)
)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
)
corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,

Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
VERDICT FORM
[AMENDED TENTATIVE]

20
21
22

We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return them
under the instructions of this Court as our verdict in this case:

23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
VERDICT FORM

1
APPLE’S PATENT CLAIMS AGAINST SAMSUNG
2
1.
3
4
5

For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the
evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (“SEC”), Samsung Electronics America
(“SEA”), and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (“STA”) has infringed
Claim 9 of the ’647 Patent?
Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for
Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.

6
7
Accused Samsung Product
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Samsung
Electronics
Co., Ltd.

Samsung
Electronics
America, Inc.

Admire (JX28B, JX28C)
Galaxy Nexus (JX29A,
JX29B, JX29C, JX29D,
JX29E, JX29G, JX29H,
JX29I, JX72)
Galaxy Note (JX30A, JX30B,
JX30C)
Galaxy Note II (JX31A,
JX31B, JX31C)
Galaxy S II (JX32A, JX32B,
JX32C, JX32D, JX32E,
JX32F)
Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch
(JX33A, JX33B, JX33C)
Galaxy S II Skyrocket
(JX34A, JX34B, JX34C,
JX34D)
Galaxy S III (JX35A, JX35B,
JX35C, JX35D, JX35E,
JX35F, JX35G, JX35H,
JX35I, JX35J, JX35L, JX35M,
JX35N, JX35O)
Stratosphere (JX37A, JX37B)

23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
VERDICT FORM

Samsung
Telecommunications
America, LLC

1
2

2.

For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the
evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (“SEC”), Samsung Electronics America
(“SEA”), and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (“STA”) has infringed
Claim 25 of the ’959 Patent?

3
4

Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for
Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.

5
6

Accused Samsung Product

7

Samsung
Electronics
Co., Ltd.

Admire (JX28B, JX 28C)
Galaxy Nexus (JX29A, JX29B,
JX29C, JX29D, JX29E,
JX29G, JX29H, JX29I)
Galaxy Note (JX30A, JX30B,
JX 30C)
Galaxy Note II (JX31A,
JX31B, JX31C)
Galaxy S II (JX32A, JX32B,
JX32C, JX32E, JX32F)
Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch
(JX33A, JX33B, JX33C)
Galaxy S II Skyrocket
(JX34A, JX34B, JX34C)
Galaxy S III (JX35G, JX35H,
JX35I, JX35J, JX35M, JX35O)
Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (JX36B,
JX36C)
Stratosphere (JX37A)

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
VERDICT FORM

Samsung
Electronics
America, Inc.

Samsung
Telecommunications
America, LLC

1
2

3.

For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the
evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (“SEC”), Samsung Electronics America
(“SEA”), and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (“STA”) has infringed
Claim 20 of the ’414 Patent?

3
4

Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for
Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.

5
6

Accused Samsung Product

7

Samsung
Electronics
Co., Ltd.

Samsung
Electronics
America, Inc.

Admire (JX28B, JX 28C)
Galaxy Nexus (JX29A,
JX29B, JX29C, JX29D,
JX29E, JX29G, JX29H,
JX29I, JX72)
Galaxy Note (JX30A, JX30B,
JX 30C)
Galaxy Note II (JX31A,
JX31B, JX31C)
Galaxy S II (JX32A, JX32B,
JX32C, JX32D, JX32E,
JX32F)
Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch
(JX33A, JX33B, JX33C)
Galaxy S II Skyrocket
(JX34A, JX34B, JX34C,
JX34D)
Galaxy S III (JX35A, JX35B,
JX35C, JX35D, JX35E,
JX35F, JX35G, JX35H,
JX35I, JX35J, JX35L,
JX35M, JX35N, JX35O)
Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (JX36A,
JX36B, JX36C, JX36D)
Stratosphere (JX37A, JX37B)

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
VERDICT FORM

Samsung
Telecommunications
America, LLC

1
2
3

4.

For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the
evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (“SEC”) and/or Samsung
Telecommunications America (“STA”) has infringed Claim 8 of the ’721 Patent?
Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for
Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.

4
5

Accused Samsung Product

6
7
8
9
10
11

Samsung
Electronics
Co., Ltd.

Admire (JX28B)
Galaxy Nexus (JX29A, JX29B,
JX29C, JX29D, JX29E, JX29H,
JX29I, JX72)
Galaxy S II (JX32C, JX32E)
Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch
(JX33A, JX33B)
Galaxy S II Skyrocket (JX34C)
Stratosphere (JX37A)

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
VERDICT FORM

Samsung
Electronics
America, Inc.

Samsung
Telecommunications
America, LLC

1
2

5.

3
4
5

If you found that Samsung Electronics America (“SEA”) or Samsung
Telecommunications America (“STA”) infringed in Questions 1-4, has Apple proven
by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (“SEC”) took
action that it knew or should have known would induce SEA or STA to infringe the
’647 Patent, ’959 Patent, ’414 Patent, and/or ’721 Patent?
Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for
Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Accused Samsung Product

21
22
23
24
25
26

’959
Patent

’414
Patent

’721
Patent

Admire (JX28)
Galaxy Nexus (JX29)
Galaxy Note (JX30)
Galaxy Note II (JX31)
Galaxy S II (JX32)
Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch (JX33)
Galaxy S II Skyrocket (JX34)
Galaxy S III (JX35)
Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (JX36)
Stratosphere (JX37)
6.

For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the
evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (“SEC”) took action it knew or should have
known would contribute to infringement of the ’647 Patent, ’959 Patent, ’414 Patent,
and/or ’721 Patent?
Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for
Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.

19
20

’647
Patent

Accused Samsung Product

’647
Patent

Admire (JX28)
Galaxy Nexus (JX29)
Galaxy Note (JX30)
Galaxy Note II (JX31)
Galaxy S II (JX32)
Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch (JX33)
Galaxy S II Skyrocket (JX34)
Galaxy S III (JX35)
Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 (JX36)
Stratosphere (JX37)

27
28
6
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
VERDICT FORM

’959
Patent

’414
Patent

’721
Patent

1

7.

Has Apple proven by clear and convincing evidence that the Samsung entity’s
infringement of any of the following patents was willful?

2
Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (for
Samsung). Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked out.

3
4

Apple Patents
5
6
7
8

Samsung
Electronics
Co., Ltd.

Samsung
Electronics
America, Inc.

Samsung
Telecommunications
America, LLC

’647 Patent (Claim 9)
’959 Patent (Claim 25)
’414 Patent (Claim 20)
’721 Patent (Claim 8)
’172 Patent (Claim 18)

9
10
11

8.

Has Samsung proven by clear and convincing evidence that Apple’s asserted patent
claims are invalid?
’647 Patent (Claim 9)

Yes ____ (for Samsung)

No ____ (for Apple)

’959 Patent (Claim 25)

Yes ____ (for Samsung)

No ____ (for Apple)

14

’414 Patent (Claim 20)

Yes ____ (for Samsung)

No ____ (for Apple)

15

’721 Patent (Claim 8)

Yes ____ (for Samsung)

No ____ (for Apple)

16

’172 Patent (Claim 18)

Yes ____ (for Samsung)

No ____ (for Apple)

12
13

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
VERDICT FORM

1
DAMAGES TO APPLE FROM SAMSUNG (IF APPLICABLE)
2
9.
3

What is the total dollar amount that Apple is entitled to receive from Samsung on
the claims on which you have ruled in favor of Apple?

4
5

$ _________________________________.

6
7
8

10.

a. For the total dollar amount in your answer to Question 9, please provide in the
chart on the next page the dollar breakdown for each product. Do not provide an
answer for any cell that is blacked out.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
VERDICT FORM

25

26

27

28

Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
VERDICT FORM

9

Stratosphere
(JX37)

23

Galaxy Tab 2
10.1
(JX36)

22

Galaxy S III
(JX35)

21

Galaxy S II
Skyrocket
(JX34)

19

Galaxy S II Epic
4G Touch
(JX33)

18

Galaxy S II
(JX32)

15

Galaxy Note II
(JX31)

14

Galaxy Note
(JX30)

12

Galaxy Nexus
(JX29)

11

Admire
(JX28)

10
’172 Patent
Claim 18

8

’721 Patent
Claim 8

7

’414 Patent
Claim 20

6

’959 Patent
Claim 25

TOTAL

3

’647 Patent
Claim 9

2

Accused
Samsung
Product

1

4

5

9

13

16

17

20

24

1
2
3

b. For the dollar amount in your answer to Question 10.a., please provide the dollar
breakdown for the following products and following periods:
Accused Samsung Product

4
5
6
7

August 1, 2011 –
June 30, 2012

Galaxy S II (JX32)
Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch
(JX33)
Galaxy S II Skyrocket
(JX34)

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
VERDICT FORM

July 1, 2012 –
August 24, 2012

August 25, 2012 Present

1
SAMSUNG’S PATENT CLAIMS AGAINST APPLE
2
11.
3
4

For each of the following products, has Samsung proven by a preponderance of the
evidence that Apple has infringed Claim 15 of the ’239 Patent?
Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Samsung), or with an “N” for “no”
(for Apple).

5
Accused Apple Product ’239 Patent
iPhone 4 (JX38)
iPhone 4S (JX39)
iPhone 5 (JX40)

6
7
8
9
10

12.

11

For each of the following products, has Samsung proven by a preponderance of the
evidence that Apple has infringed Claim 27 of the ’449 Patent?
Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Samsung), or with an “N” for “no”
(for Apple).

12
13

Accused Apple Product ’449 Patent
iPhone 4 (JX38)
iPhone 4S (JX39)
iPhone 5 (JX40)
iPod touch, 4th gen. (JX45)
iPod touch, 5th gen. (JX46)

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

13.

Has Samsung proven by clear and convincing evidence that Apple’s infringement of
any of the following patents was willful?
Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Samsung), or with an “N” for “no”
(for Apple).
Samsung Patents
’239 Patent (Claim 15)
’449 Patent (Claim 27)

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

11
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
VERDICT FORM

Apple

1
DAMAGES TO SAMSUNG FROM APPLE (IF APPLICABLE)
2
14.
3

What is the total dollar amount that Samsung is entitled to receive from Apple on
the claims on which you have ruled in favor of Samsung?

4
5

$ _________________________________.

6
7
8

15.

For the total dollar amount in your answer to Question 14, please provide in the
chart below the dollar breakdown for each product. Do not provide an answer for any
cell that is blacked out.

9
10
11
12
13
14

Accused Apple
Product

’449 Patent
Claim 27

’239 Patent
Claim 15

TOTAL

iPhone 4
(JX38)
iPhone 4S
(JX39)

15

iPhone 5
(JX40)

16

iPod Touch, 4th gen.
(JX46)

17

iPod Touch, 5th gen.
(JX45)

18
19
20

Have the presiding juror sign and date this form.

21
22
23
24

Signed: ________________________________
PRESIDING JUROR

25
26
27
28
12
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
VERDICT FORM

Date: ____________________