Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 1854

ORDER re: objections to closing slides. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/28/2014. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

)
)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
)
corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,

I.

Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER RE: HIGH-PRIORITY
OBJECTIONS ON CLOSING SLIDES

SAMSUNG’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S CLOSING SLIDES
Samsung has filed objections to Apple’s Closing Slides. ECF No. 1830-1. Apple has filed a

23

response. ECF No. 1829. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case,

24

and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on

25

Samsung’s objections as follows:

26
27
28

SAMSUNG’S
OBJECTION
Slide 28

COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION
Overruled.

1
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER RE: HIGH PRIORITY OBJECTIONS ON CLOSING SLIDES

5

Slides 38, 39,
56, 57, 58
Slide 40
Slide 51
Slides 56-58
Slide 90
Slide 101
Slide 108

6

Slide 112

1
2
3
4

7

Overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Sustained as to the first question and answer, which comprise the first six lines
of the transcript excerpt. Overruled as to the remainder.
Sustained. Counsel may not use this slide but may discuss Samsung’s statement
in opening that Samsung was awarded the second highest number of patents in
2013 after IBM.

8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

II.

APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S CLOSING SLIDES
Apple has filed objections to Samsung’s Closing Slides. ECF No. 1829. Samsung has filed

a response. ECF No. 1830-1. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the
case, and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on
Apple’s objections as follows:
APPLE’S
OBJECTION
Slide 16
Slides 18, 119
Slide 21
Slide 30
Slide 35
Slides 42, 116
Slide 43A
Slide 53
Slides 54, 103,
110
Slides 55, 61,
87, 88
Slides 57, 92
Slide 58
Slide 60
Slide 80
Slide 90
Slide 91
Slide 97
Slide 109
Slides 114-115

COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION
Sustained.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Sustained.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Sustained as to bottom two screenshots. Overruled as to top screenshot.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Sustained as to bottom two screenshots. Overruled as to top screenshot.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.

28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER RE: HIGH PRIORITY OBJECTIONS ON CLOSING SLIDES

1
2

III. SEALING
Samsung requests to seal various closing slides. ECF No. 1830-1. Having considered

3

Samsung’s motion, and compelling reasons having been shown, the Court seals the following

4

slides as follows:

5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Apple Slides
46
47
91
97-101
106
107
Samsung
Slides
1
4
5
7
21
25
66
67
71
Fazio
Declaration
Exhibit D

COURT’S RULING ON SEALING REQUEST
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
COURT’S RULING ON SEALING REQUEST
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.

18
Apple requests to seal various closing slides. ECF No. 1829. Having considered Apple’s
19
motion, and compelling reasons having been shown, the Court seals the following slides as
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

follows:
Apple Slides
84
87
88
94
95
106
107
117
Samsung
Slides
66

COURT’S RULING ON SEALING REQUEST
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED. 
COURT’S RULING ON SEALING REQUEST
GRANTED.

3
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER RE: HIGH PRIORITY OBJECTIONS ON CLOSING SLIDES

1

67
71

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3

Dated: April 28, 2014

4

GRANTED.
GRANTED.

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
ORDER RE: HIGH PRIORITY OBJECTIONS ON CLOSING SLIDES