Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 38

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting #27 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 APPLE, INC., a California corporation, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a ) Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ) ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York ) corporation; and SAMSUNG ) TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, ) a Delaware limited liability company, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK ORDER GRANTING APPLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS (re: dkt. #27) 20 Having considered all the papers filed in connection with Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) 21 administrative motion to exceed the page limit in connection with its Motion and Memorandum in 22 Support of Apple’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, and for good cause shown, the Court 23 hereby GRANTS Apple’s administrative motion to exceed the page limit set in Civil Local Rule 7- 24 2(b) by eight pages of text. Defendants’ brief in opposition to Apple’s Motion for a Preliminary 25 Injunction may also exceed the page limit by up to eight pages of text. No other requests to exceed 26 the page limit with respect to briefing on Apple’s preliminary injunction motion will be granted. 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 1 Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS 1 2 Dated: February 28, 2012 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?