Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
471
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 4/24/2013. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; and SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Clerk: Martha Parker Brown
Reporter: Lee-Anne Shortridge
22
23
24
25
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Josh Krevitt, Mark Lyon, Mark Reiter,
Bill Lee, Mark Selwyn
Defendants’ Attorneys: Victoria Maroulis, William Price,
Kevin Johnson, Todd Briggs
A case management conference was held on April 24, 2013. A further case management
conference is set for June 26, 2013, at 2:00 p.m.
By May 8, 2013, each side shall file a Case Narrowing Statement with a revised list of no
more than 22 accused products.
26
27
28
By May 29, 2013, the parties shall file a joint status report regarding the parties’ ability to
stipulate to representative products. The Court strongly encourages the parties to reach a
stipulation on this issue.
1
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
By June 28, 2013, the parties will be required to dismiss without prejudice two patents from
the case so that neither side will be asserting more than six patents. In addition, the parties will be
required to limit their asserted claims to 15 per side and limit their accused products to 18 per side.
By July 5, 2013, the parties will be required to reduce their invalidity
references/systems/combinations to 45 per side.
By September 2, 2013, the parties will be required to dismiss without prejudice one patent
from the case so that neither side will be asserting more than five patents. In addition, the parties
will be required to limit their asserted claims to 10 per side and limit their accused products to 15
per side.
By September 9, 2013, the parties will be required to reduce their invalidity
references/systems/combinations to 25 per side.
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
By February 6, 2014, the parties will be required to limit their asserted claims to 5 per side
and limit their accused products to 10 per side. In addition, the parties will be required to reduce
their invalidity references/systems/combinations to 15 per side.
During expert discovery, each side will be limited to 15 experts and 15 opening expert
reports. Each side shall be limited to filing no more than 5 Daubert motions in this case. At trial,
each side shall be limited to no more than 12 testifying experts.
The case schedule remains as set previously:
Scheduled Event
Date
16
Fact Discovery Cut-Off
July 8, 2013
17
Initial Expert Disclosures
July 26, 2013
Rebuttal Expert Reports
August 16, 2013
18
Close of Expert Discovery
August 30, 2013
19
Last Day to File Dispositive Motions
September 26, 2013
20
Opposition Briefs on Dispositive Motions
October 24, 2013
21
Reply Briefs on Dispositive Motions
November 14, 2013
Hearing on Dispositive Motions (a hearing on Daubert
motions will be scheduled at the next Case Management
Conference)
December 12, 2013, at 1:30 p.m.
22
23
Final Pretrial Conference
March 5, 2014, at 2:00 p.m.
24
Jury Trial
March 31, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.
25
Length of Trial
12 days
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Dated: April 24, 2012
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?