Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 690

STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (DOCKET NO. #647 ) BY NOKIA CORPORATION, granting #679 : Opposition due by 7/24/2013. Reply due by 7/31/2013. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 7/17/2013. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2013)

Download PDF
1         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION   APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 12-cv-00630-LHK  STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER BY NOKIA CORPORATION Plaintiff,  vs.  SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG  ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG  TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,  Defendants.           02198.51990/5411039.1 Case No. 12-cv-00630-LHK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER BY NOKIA CORPORATION  PLAPL 1 WHEREAS, on July 1, 2013, Nokia Corporation filed its Motion for Protective Order by 2 Nokia Corporation (Dkt. 647) and service was effectuated by overnight delivery; 3 WHEREAS the opposition of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics 4 America, Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively "Samsung") is 5 currently due on July 18, 2013, and Samsung has requested an extension until July 24, 2013 to file 6 its opposition; 7 WHEREAS Nokia Corporation consents to Samsung’s request for an extension of time; 8 THEREFORE, the parties, through their undersigned counsel of record, stipulate as 9 follows: 10 1. Samsung's opposition to the Motion for Protective Order by Nokia Corporation 11 shall be due on July 24, 2013. 12 2. Nokia's reply in support of its Motion for Protective Order shall be due on July 31, 13 2013. 14 15 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 17 18 DATED: July 10, 2013 ALSTON & BIRD, LLP 19 20 21 22 By /s/ Ryan W. Koppelman Randall L. Allen Ryan W. Koppelman Attorneys for NOKIA CORPORATION 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51990/5411039.1 Case No. 12-cv-00630-LHK -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER BY NOKIA CORPORATION 1 DATED: July 10, 2013 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 2 3 By /s/ Victoria F. Maroulis Charles K. Verhoeven Kevin P.B. Johnson Victoria F. Maroulis Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ORDER 13 14 15 16 Based on the foregoing stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 DATED: ___________________ July 17, 2013 19 The Honorable Paul S. Grewal United States Magistrate Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51990/5411039.1 Case No. 12-cv-00630-LHK -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER BY NOKIA CORPORATION 1 2 ATTESTATION I, Victoria F. Maroulis, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file 3 this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45 X.B., I hereby attest that Ryan W. 4 Koppelman has concurred in this filing. 5 6 Dated: July 10, 2013 7 By: /s/ Victoria F. Maroulis Victoria F. Maroulis 8 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 10 11 12 13 The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been served on July 9, to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court’s ECF system per Civil Local Rule 5-1. 14 15 Dated: July 10, 2013 By: /s/ Victoria F. Maroulis Victoria F. Maroulis 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51990/5411039.1 Case No. 12-cv-00630-LHK -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER BY NOKIA CORPORATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?