Innovus Prime, LLC v. Panasonic Corporation et al

Filing 35

ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR EXPEDITED BRIEFING AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S RULE 56(D) MOTION by Judge Ronald M. Whyte (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2012)

1
2
3
4

E-FILED on 8/24/12

5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

8

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12

INNOVUS PRIME LLC.,

13
14
15
16

No. 12-CV-00660 RMW

Plaintiff,
v.
PANASONIC CORPORATION,
PANASONIC CORPORATION OF
AMERICA.,

17

ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR
EXPEDITED BRIEFING AND HEARING ON
PLAINTIFF’S RULE 56(D) MOTION
[Re Docket No. 31]

Defendants.

18
19

For good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that:

20
21

1) Defendants have until August 29, 2012 at 5 P.M. to respond to plaintiff’s Rule 56(d)

22

motion.

23
24

2) Plaintiff’s Rule 56(d) motion will be heard on August 31, 2012 prior to or during the

25

scheduled Case Management Conference.

26
27

3) Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to defendants’ motion for summary judgment is extended

28

until September 5, 2012, unless plaintiff’s Rule 56(d) motion is granted or the briefing
ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR EXPEDITED BRIEFING AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S RULE 56(D) MOTION
12-00660 RMW

—No.

1

schedule is otherwise modified by court order or stipulation.

2
3

DATED:______8/24/12___

_________________________________

4

RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR EXPEDITED BRIEFING AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S RULE 56(D) MOTION
12-00660 RMW

2

—No.