Innovus Prime, LLC v. Panasonic Corporation et al

Filing 44

ORDER CLARIFYING PARTIES' REQUIREMENTS RE SCHEDULING. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on September 12, 2012. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2012)

1
2
3
4

E-FILED on 9/12/12

5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

8

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12

INNOVUS PRIME LLC.,

13
14
15
16
17

No. 12-CV-00660 RMW

Plaintiff,
ORDER CLARIFYING PARTIES'
REQUIREMENTS RE SCHEDULING

v.
PANASONIC CORPORATION,
PANASONIC CORPORATION OF
AMERICA.,
Defendants.

18
19

On August 31, 2012, the court held a hearing on plaintiff's Rule 56(d) motion. The court

20

continued the September 21, 2012 hearing on defendant's motion for summary judgment and ordered

21

the parties to meet and confer regarding the scheduling of discovery, as well as further briefing and a

22

hearing on defendant's summary judgment motion. The parties are to either stipulate to a schedule,

23

or if they cannot agree, to submit their respective proposals to the court. The September 21, 2012

24

summary judgment hearing is vacated.

25

It is so ordered.

26

DATED:_____9/12/12__

27

_________________________________
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge

28
ORDER CLARIFYING PARTIES' REQUIREMENTS RE SCHEDULING

—No. 12-00660 RMW