Karboau v. Enyinwa
Filing
8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. For the foregoing reasons, this action is hereby DISMISSED for lack of federal jurisdiction. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions as moot. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/26/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MILAUDI KARBOAU,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
15
EMMANUEL EKE ENYINWA,
Defendant.
No. C 12-00705 EJD (PR)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
16
17
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil law suit against his former attorney
18
Defendant Emmanuel Eke Enyinwa. For the reasons discussed below, this case is
19
DISMISSED without prejudice.
20
21
DISCUSSION
22
A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a
23
prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a
24
governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify
25
any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a
26
claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is
27
immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). Pro se pleadings must,
28
however, be liberally construed. See Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696,
Order of Dismissal
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.EJD\CR.12\00705Karboau_dism.wpd
1
1
2
699 (9th Cir. 1988).
To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential
3
elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was
4
violated, and (2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the
5
color of state law. See West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).
6
Plaintiff claims his former attorney Defendant Enyinwa violated his ethical and
7
professional responsibilities in representing Plaintiff during deportation proceedings in
8
San Francisco, California. Plaintiff claims that Defendant violated his right to effective
9
assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Plaintiff
10
claims that this Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and § 1343(a)(3).
11
Plaintiff’s civil action against his former attorney must be dismissed. Attorneys in
12
private practice are not state actors. See Simmons v. Sacramento County Superior Court,
13
318 F.3d 1156, 1161 (9th Cir. 2003); see also Kimes v. Stone, 84 F.3d 1121, 1126 (9th
14
Cir. 1996) (attorneys are private actors). Services performed by a private attorney in
15
connection with a lawsuit do not constitute action under color of state law. See Franklin
16
v. Oregon, 662 F.2d 1337, 1345 (9th Cir. 1981); Briley v. California, 564 F.2d 849, 855-
17
56 (9th Cir. 1977). And claims for legal malpractice do not come within the jurisdiction
18
of the federal courts. See Franklin, 662 F.2d at 1344. Accordingly, this action must be
19
dismissed to Plaintiff filing it in a state action.
20
CONCLUSION
21
22
23
For the foregoing reasons, this action is hereby DISMISSED for lack of federal
jurisdiction. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions as moot.
24
25
DATED:
6/26/2012
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
26
27
28
Order of Dismissal
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.EJD\CR.12\00705Karboau_dism.wpd
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MILAUDI KARBOAU,
Case Number: CV12-00705 EJD
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
EMMANUEL EKE ENYINWA,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on
, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the
6/27/2012
attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s)
hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into
an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Milaudi Karboau
1818 NE Marin Luther King Blvd
Portland, OR 97212
Dated:
6/27/2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?