Mardesich et al v. Ignacio
Filing
15
ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT. Federal jurisdiction over this action is lacking for the reasons stated in the original memorandum. The clerk shall therefore REMAND this action to Santa Clara County Superior Court and close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/5/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/5/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
SAN JOSE DIVISION
5
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00867 EJD
CONNIE MARDESICH, et. al.,
6
ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO
STATE COURT
Plaintiff(s),
7
8
v.
TEVIS R. IGNACIO,
9
Defendant(s).
/
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
On February 22, 2012, Defendant Tevis R. Ignacio (“Defendant”) removed to this court what
12
appears to be a domestic relations action originally filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court. See
13
Docket Item No. 1. After reviewing the action, this court issued a Memorandum and Order to Show
14
Cause (“OSC”) on March 2, 2012, requiring Defendant to demonstrate the basis for federal
15
jurisdiction by March 16, 2012. See Docket Item No. 9. The court then extended the response
16
deadline to April 4, 2012. See Docket Item No. 12.
17
On March 29, 2012, Defendant submitted a return to the OSC and Request for Judicial
18
Notice under the name “Robin Hood.” See Docket Item Nos. 13, 14. The court has reviewed these
19
submissions but finds them unresponsive to the question of jurisdiction.
20
Accordingly, federal jurisdiction over this action is lacking for the reasons stated in the
21
original memorandum. The clerk shall therefore REMAND this action to Santa Clara County
22
Superior Court and close this file.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: April 5, 2012
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
26
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00867 EJD
ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?