Twin Peaks Software Inc. v. Red Hat, Inc. et al

Filing 52

Order by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte granting 49 Stipulation (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Katherine Kelly Lutton (SBN 194971)
[e-mail]
Shelley K. Mack (SBN 209596)
[e-mail]
Jerry T. Yen (SBN 247988)
[e-mail]
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, CA 94063
Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs
RED HAT, INC. AND GLUSTER, INC.
Christopher D. Banys (State Bar No. 230038)
Richard C. Lin (State Bar No. 209233)
Jennifer C. Lu (State Bar No. 255820)
Nicholas S. Mancuso (State Bar No. 271668)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
THE LANIER LAW FIRM, P.C.
2200 Geng Road, Suite 200
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile: [phone]

16
17

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant
TWIN PEAKS SOFTWARE INC.

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SAN JOSE DIVISION

21

TWIN PEAKS SOFTWARE INC.,

22

Case No. 5:12-cv-00911 RMW
[PROPOSED] ORDER ADOPTING
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO FILE RESPONSE AND REPLY
TO PLAINTIFF TWIN PEAKS
SOFTWARE INC.’S MOTION TO
RETAIN CONFIDENTIALITY OF
ITS SOURCE CODE

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant,

23

v.

24

RED HAT, INC. AND GLUSTER, INC.,

25

Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs.

26
27
28

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER ADOPTING
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE
AND REPLY TO TWIN PEAKS’ MOTION
5:12-cv-00911 RMW

1

Having carefully considered Plaintiff Twin Peaks Software Inc. (“Twin Peaks”) and

2

Defendants Red Hat, Inc. and Gluster, Inc. (collectively, “Red Hat”) stipulation to extend the time

3

to file the response and reply to Plaintiff Twin Peaks’ Motion to Retain Confidentiality of Source

4

Code, the Court ADOPTS the Stipulation and orders that the briefing schedule be set as follows:

5
6

Current Deadline

New Deadline

7

Responsive Brief

December 26, 2012

January 18, 2013

8

Reply Brief

January 2, 2013

January 25, 2013

9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12

_____________________________________
Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge

January 7, 2013
DATED: _____________________________

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

50878748.doc

23
24
25
26
27
28

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER ADOPTING
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE
AND REPLY TO TWIN PEAKS’ MOTION
5:12-cv-00911 RMW