Advanced Engineering Solution, Inc v. Paccar, Inc. et al

Filing 37

ORDER SETTING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO OSC. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on August 20, 2012. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

8

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
PACCAR, INC., a Delaware corporation;
)
KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANY, an
)
unknown entity; KALYPSO, INC., a
corporation; PARAMETRIC TECHNOLOGY )
CORPORATION, a Massachusetts corporation; )
)
ANDREW TIMM, an individual; JORDAN
)
REYNOLDS, an individual; and DOES 1
)
through 100, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
ADVANCED ENGINEERING SOLUTION,
INC., a California corporation,

Case No.: 5:12-cv-00986-LHK
ORDER SETTING TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO REPLY TO
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO OSC

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

On July 23, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiff Advanced Engineering Solution, Inc. to show
cause why the instant case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute (the “OSC”). Plaintiff
was ordered to file its response to the OSC by August, 13, 2012. Plaintiff has done so.
On August, 13, 2012, Defendant Kalypso emailed the Court to inquire whether the Court
had set a deadline by which Defendants could respond to the OSC. This is a prohibited ex parte
communication in violation of Local Rule 11-4(c). Nevertheless, the Court hereby orders that any

28
1
Case No.: 5:12-cv-00986-LHK
ORDER SETTING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO OSC

1

Defendant wishing to file a reply addressing Plaintiff’s response to the OSC shall do so by August

2

22, 2012.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

Dated: August 20, 2012

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 5:12-cv-00986-LHK
ORDER SETTING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO OSC