Phongboupha v. Hedgpeth
ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 17 Motion to Extend Time to File Answer. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2013)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GERRY GP PHONGBOUPHA,
WARDEN A. HEDGPETH,
No. C 12-1025 RMW (PR)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
EXTEND TIME TO FILE
(Docket No. 17)
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This court issued an order to show cause. (Doc. No. 8.)
Respondent has filed a motion to extend time to file an answer to the petition for writ of habeas
corpus. (Doc. No. 17.) Good cause appearing, respondent’s motion is GRANTED. Respondent
shall file an answer no later than April 2, 2013. If respondent files an answer, petitioner may
file a traverse within thirty (30) days thereafter.
Should respondent file a dispositive motion in lieu of an answer, petitioner shall file his
opposition within twenty-eight (28) days after the answer is filed. Respondent shall file a reply
within fourteen (14) days thereafter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
Order Granting Motion to Extend Time to file Answer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case Number: CV12-01025 RMW
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
A HEDGPETH et al,
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on February 21, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Gerry GP Phongboupha G-29087
Salinas Valley State Prison
PO Box 1050
Soledad, CA 93960
Dated: February 21, 2013
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?