Flores et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc et al
Filing
35
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting #30 Stipulation selecting Private Mediation (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2012) Modified on 7/17/2012 (cmf, COURT STAFF).
Case5:12-cv-01029-LHK Document30 Filed07/10/12 Page1 of 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Rick Flores and Tisha Flores
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-01029LHK
Plaintiffs),
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
v.
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Thor Motor Coach, Inc., et
al.
Defendant(s).
/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Q
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
pi
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
|_J
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any otherform ofADR mustparticipate in an
ADR phone conference and may notfile this form. They must insteadfile a Notice ofNeedfor
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
1/1
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Mediation
Michael Ornstil of JAMS
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
1/1
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 daysfrom the date ofthe order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
•
other requested deadline
Dated: 7/9/12
<—AttorneyToFPlaintiff
Dated:
Attorney for Defendant
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
07/10/2012 10:42 FAX
4153910281
SHOOK
HARDV
&
©002/003
BACON
Case5:12-cv-01029-LHK Document30 Filed07/10/12 Page2 of 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Rick Flores and Tisha Flores
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-0l029LHK
Plaintiffs),
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED!
v.
Tbor Motor Coach, Int., et
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
aL
Defendants).
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADRL.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
3
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR LR. 4)
B
Early NeutralEvaluation (ENE) (ADR Lit 5)
Mediation (ADRLJL 6)
(Note; Parties who believe that an early settlementconference with aMagistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any otherform ofADR mustparticipate in an
ADR phone conference and may notfile thisform. They must insteadfile aNotice ofNeedfor
ADR Phone Conference. See CivilLocal Rule 16-8 andADR L.R. 3-5)
pErfvate Process:
El
.
Private ADR(please identify process andprovider) jaefliatton
Michael Ornstil of JAMS
The parties agree to holdthe ADR session by:
171
' the presumptive deadline (The deadlineis 90 daysfrom the date ofthe order
referring the case toan ADR process unless otherwise ordered, )
n
other requested deadline
Dated:JJM1
_.
<^AttorHeyTor Plaintitl
:7/W*^
Dated
TbrA (*&»* £*
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
Case5:12-cv-01029-LHK Document30 Filed07/10/12 Page3 of 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Rick Flores and Tisha Flores
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-Q1029LHK
Plaintiffs),
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
v.
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Thor Motor Coach, Inc., et
al.
Defendant(s).
/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
I
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any otherform ofADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may notfile this form. They must insteadfile a Notice ofNeedfor
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 andADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
[/I
Private ADR [please identify process and provide}-) Mediation
Michael Omstil of JAMS
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[7]
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 daysfrom the date ofthe order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
I I
other requested deadline
Dated: 7/9/12
Dated:
M
WL
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
Attorney for Defendant
COMfAj^fiS
Case5:12-cv-01029-LHK Document30 Filed07/10/12 Page4 of 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Rick Flores and Tisha Flores
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-0T029LHK
Plaintiffs),
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
v.
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Thor Motor Coach, Inc., et
ai:
Defendants).
/
Counsel reportthat they havemet andconferred regarding ADR and have reachedthe
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
[""I
Q
r~[
Non-binding Arbitration. (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe thatan earlysettlement conference witlia MagistrateJudge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than anyotherform ofADR mustparticipate in an
ADR phoneconference andmay notfile thisform. They must insteadfile a NoticeofNeedfor
ADR Phone Conference. See CivilLocalRule 16-8andADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
l/l
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Mediation
Michael Omstil of JAMS
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[/]
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 daysfrom the dale ofthe order
referring the case to an ADR processunless otherwise ordered.)
I I
other requested deadline
Dated: 7/9/12
Dated: 1/1//^
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
♦^2^^
Case5:12-cv-01029-LHK Document30 Filed07/10/12 Page5 of 5
[PROPOSED] ORDER
[H
Q
Dated:
The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 10, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
JUDGE
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."
Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?