Flores et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc et al

Filing 35

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting #30 Stipulation selecting Private Mediation (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2012) Modified on 7/17/2012 (cmf, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Case5:12-cv-01029-LHK Document30 Filed07/10/12 Page1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Rick Flores and Tisha Flores CASE NO. 5:12-cv-01029LHK Plaintiffs), STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] v. ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Thor Motor Coach, Inc., et al. Defendant(s). / Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Q Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) pi Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) |_J Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any otherform ofADR mustparticipate in an ADR phone conference and may notfile this form. They must insteadfile a Notice ofNeedfor ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: 1/1 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Mediation Michael Ornstil of JAMS The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 1/1 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 daysfrom the date ofthe order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) • other requested deadline Dated: 7/9/12 <—AttorneyToFPlaintiff Dated: Attorney for Defendant CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE 07/10/2012 10:42 FAX 4153910281 SHOOK HARDV & ©002/003 BACON Case5:12-cv-01029-LHK Document30 Filed07/10/12 Page2 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Rick Flores and Tisha Flores CASE NO. 5:12-cv-0l029LHK Plaintiffs), STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED! v. Tbor Motor Coach, Int., et ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS aL Defendants). Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADRL.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 3 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR LR. 4) B Early NeutralEvaluation (ENE) (ADR Lit 5) Mediation (ADRLJL 6) (Note; Parties who believe that an early settlementconference with aMagistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any otherform ofADR mustparticipate in an ADR phone conference and may notfile thisform. They must insteadfile aNotice ofNeedfor ADR Phone Conference. See CivilLocal Rule 16-8 andADR L.R. 3-5) pErfvate Process: El . Private ADR(please identify process andprovider) jaefliatton Michael Ornstil of JAMS The parties agree to holdthe ADR session by: 171 ' the presumptive deadline (The deadlineis 90 daysfrom the date ofthe order referring the case toan ADR process unless otherwise ordered, ) n other requested deadline Dated:JJM1 _. <^AttorHeyTor Plaintitl :7/W*^ Dated TbrA (*&»* £* CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE Case5:12-cv-01029-LHK Document30 Filed07/10/12 Page3 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Rick Flores and Tisha Flores CASE NO. 5:12-cv-Q1029LHK Plaintiffs), STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] v. ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Thor Motor Coach, Inc., et al. Defendant(s). / Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) I Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any otherform ofADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may notfile this form. They must insteadfile a Notice ofNeedfor ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 andADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: [/I Private ADR [please identify process and provide}-) Mediation Michael Omstil of JAMS The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: [7] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 daysfrom the date ofthe order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) I I other requested deadline Dated: 7/9/12 Dated: M WL CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE Attorney for Defendant COMfAj^fiS Case5:12-cv-01029-LHK Document30 Filed07/10/12 Page4 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Rick Flores and Tisha Flores CASE NO. 5:12-cv-0T029LHK Plaintiffs), STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] v. ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Thor Motor Coach, Inc., et ai: Defendants). / Counsel reportthat they havemet andconferred regarding ADR and have reachedthe following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: [""I Q r~[ Non-binding Arbitration. (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe thatan earlysettlement conference witlia MagistrateJudge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than anyotherform ofADR mustparticipate in an ADR phoneconference andmay notfile thisform. They must insteadfile a NoticeofNeedfor ADR Phone Conference. See CivilLocalRule 16-8andADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: l/l Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Mediation Michael Omstil of JAMS The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: [/] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 daysfrom the dale ofthe order referring the case to an ADR processunless otherwise ordered.) I I other requested deadline Dated: 7/9/12 Dated: 1/1//^ CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE ♦^2^^ Case5:12-cv-01029-LHK Document30 Filed07/10/12 Page5 of 5 [PROPOSED] ORDER [H Q Dated: The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. July 10, 2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation." Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?