Williams v. Castillo et al

Filing 84

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 79 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 JAMES EDWARD WILLIAMS, v. CASTILLO, et al., 17 C 12-1116 RMW (PR) Plaintiff, [Proposed] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Judge: The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte Trial Date: n/a Action Filed: March 6, 2012 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 For good cause appearing, Defendants’ request for an extension of time to file a reply to Williams’ opposition to Defendants’ Motion for summary judgment is granted. Defendants may file a reply to the opposition on or before June 7, 2013. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:_______ ________________________________________________ The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge 26 27 28 1 [Order] Grant’g Defs.’ Mot. Extension Time File Reply Opp’n Mot. Summ. J. (C 12-1116 RMW (PR)) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES E WILLIAMS, Case Number: CV12-01116 RMW Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. CASTILLO et al, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on June 13, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. James Edward Williams V-54214 Kern Valley State Prison D-5-113 P.O. Box 5104 Delano, CA 93216 Dated: June 13, 2013 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?