Brown et al v. Vericrest Financial, Inc, et al

Filing 24

FURTHER STIPULATION AND ORDER 22 to Extend Time for Citimortgage, Inc. to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/19/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Brian H. Gunn (SBN 192594)
[e-mail]
Joshua M. Bryan (SBN 225230)
[e-mail]
WOLFE & WYMAN LLP
2175 N. California Blvd., Suite 645
Walnut Creek, California 94596-3502
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. (erroneously sued as
“CITIMORTGAGE, INC., successor in interest to
PREFERRED FINANICAL GROUP, INC., formerly a
California Corporation, doing business as
WWW.WHOLESALE LENDINGONLINE.COM”)

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN JOSE DIVISION

13

SHARON R. BROWN,

14

Plaintiff,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Case No.: 5:12-01152 RMW
FURTHER STIPULATION AND
[] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
FOR CITIMORTGAGE, INC. TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

v.
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., a New York corporation,
successor in interest to PREFERRED FINANCIAL
GROUP, INC., formerly a California corporation,
doing business as WWW
WHOLESALENDINGONLINE.COM; QUALITY
LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION, a California
corporation; and all persons or entities unknown
claiming any legal or equitable right, title, estate,
lien or interest in the property described in this
complaint adverse to Plaintiff’s title thereto, and
DOES 1 through 25, inclusive,

Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

Defendants.

22
23
24
25

WHEREAS:

26

A.

As more fully described below, plaintiff SHARON R. BROWN ("Plaintiff') and

27

Defendant CITIMORTGAGE, INC. ("Defendant") have agreed to extend Defendant's time to file

28

and serve their response to the first amended complaint ("FAC") in the above-referenced action, in
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CITIMORTGAGE INC.’S TIME TO RESPOND

1090903.1

1

order to facilitate ongoing settlement discussions between the parties and a possible resolution of the

2

matter.

3

B.

Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint was filed on April 9, 2012.

4

C.

Defendants' time to respond to the FAC is June 7, 2012.

5

D.

Plaintiff and Defendant are engaged in ongoing settlement discussions and desire to

6

continue to focus their efforts on potential resolution of this matter, rather than incurring litigation

7

costs and expenses; and

8
9

E.

Accordingly, the parties hereto have agreed to a further extension of time, up to and

including June 28, 2012, for the reasons set forth above.

10

THEREFORE:

11

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant, that Defendant

12

CITIMORTGAGE, INC. shall have up to and including June 28, 2012, to file and serve its response

13

to the FAC.

14
15

DATED: June 6, 2012

WOLFE & WYMAN LLP

16
By: /s/ Joshua M. Bryan SBN 225230
BRIAN H. GUNN
JOSHUA M. BRYAN
Attorneys for Defendant
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. (erroneously sued as
“CITIMORTGAGE, INC., successor in interest to
PREFERRED FINANICAL GROUP, INC., formerly
a California Corporation, doing business as
WWW.WHOLESALE LENDINGONLINE.COM”)

17
18
19
20
21
22
DATED: June 6, 2012

CONSUMER LITIGATION LAW CENTER

23
24
25
26

By: /s/ September J. Katje – with authorization
SEPTEMBER J. KATJE
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SHARON R. BROWN

27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CITIMORTGAGE INC.’S TIME TO RESPOND
1090903.1

ORDER

1
2

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefor,

3

IT IS ORDERED that:

4

Defendant CITIMORTGAGE, INC. has up to and including June 28, 2012 to file and serve

5
6

its response to the first amended complaint in this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED:

7
8
9

DATED: __________________

___________________________________
HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CITIMORTGAGE INC.’S TIME TO RESPOND
1090903.1