North Coast Medical, Inc. v. Danmic Global, LLC et al

Filing 67

*** FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE IGNORE.*** ORDER DISMISSING GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC., AURORA BANK FSB, AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC, AND MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: AKERMAN SENTERFITT, LLP, TAYLOR L. BROADHEAD, AND JUSTIN D. BALSER; ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on January 3, 2013. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013) Modified on 1/3/2013 (lhklc1, COURT STAFF). Modified on 1/3/2013 (lhklc1, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION IMANT KOTSINSH and DAVID-WYNN MILLER, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) FIRST AMERICAN TITLE, a California ) Corporation; GREENPOINT FUNDING ) INCORPORATED, a New York Corporation; ) FINANCIAL TITLE COMPANY, a California ) Corporation; MARIN CONVEYANCING ) CORPORATION, “as Trustee”; AURORA ) LOAN SERVICES, LLC; AURORA BANK; ) FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, A COLORADO ) CORPORATION; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC ) REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. “MERS”- ) A/K/A MERS CORPORATION, ) INCORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; ) AKERMAN SENTERFITT, LLP, a California ) Limited Liability Partnership Company; IMRAN ) HAYAT, ESQ., an Individual; TAYLOR L. ) BROADHEAD, ESQ., an Individual; JUSTIN D. ) BASLER, ESQ., an Individual; TFLG ) CORPORATION, a California Corporation; ) ERIC FERNANDEZ, ESQ., an Individual; ) SEAN BEDROSIAN, ESQ., an Individual; ) LAURIE HOWELL, ESQ., an Individual; CAL- ) WESTERN RECONVEYANCE ) CORPORATION, “as Trustee”, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No.: 12-CV-04636-LHK ORDER DISMISSING GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC., AURORA BANK FSB, AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC, AND MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: AKERMAN SENTERFITT, LLP, TAYLOR L. BROADHEAD, AND JUSTIN D. BALSER; ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 Case No.: 12-CV-04636-LHK ORDER OF DISMISSAL; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: AKERMAN SENTERFITT, LLP, TAYLOR L. BROADHEAD, AND JUSTIN D. BALSER; ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on September 5, 2012. ECF No. 1. Plaintiffs’ Complaint 2 appears to consist of miscellaneous words and numbers. 3 Order of Dismissal 4 On October 5, 2012, Defendant Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. (“Defendant 5 Greenpoint”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint. See ECF No. 7. Pursuant to Civil 6 Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendant Greenpoint’s motion to dismiss was due on 7 October 19, 2012. Plaintiffs did not (and have not) filed an opposition or statement of non- 8 opposition to Defendant Greenpoint’s motion to dismiss. Accordingly, on November 26, 2012, the 9 Court ordered Plaintiffs to show cause why this case should not be dismissed with prejudice as to United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Defendant Greenpoint for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 12 (“Greenpoint OSC”). The Court 11 initially set Plaintiffs’ deadline to respond to the OSC on December 10, 2012. Id. However, the 12 Court later extended this deadline to December 27, 2012. ECF No. 16. The Court set the hearing 13 on the Greenpoint OSC for January 2, 2013 at 2:00 P.M. ECF No. 12. The Court notified 14 Plaintiffs that if Plaintiffs failed to respond to the Greenpoint OSC and failed to appear at the 15 January 2, 2013 hearing, the Court would dismiss Plaintiffs’ case with prejudice as to Defendant 16 Greenpoint for failure to prosecute. Id. 17 On November 19, 2012, Defendants Aurora Bank FSB, Aurora Loan Services, LLC, 18 Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Akerman Senterfitt, LLP, Taylor L. Broadhead, 19 and Justin D. Balser (collectively, “Aurora Defendants”) also filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 20 11. Plaintiffs’ opposition to the Aurora Defendants’ motion to dismiss was due on December 3, 21 2012. See Local Rule 7-3(a). Plaintiffs did not (and have not) filed an opposition or statement of 22 non-opposition the Aurora Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Accordingly, on December 13, 2012, 23 the Court ordered Plaintiffs to show cause why this case should not be dismissed as to Defendants 24 Aurora Bank FSB, Aurora Loan Services, LLC, and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, 25 Inc. ECF No. 14 (“Aurora OSC”). The Court inadvertently omitted Defendants Akerman 26 Senterfitt, LLP, Taylor L. Broadhead, and Justin D. Balser from the Aurora OSC. The Court 27 ordered Plaintiffs to respond to the OSC by December 27, 2012. Id. The hearing on the Aurora 28 2 Case No.: 12-CV-04636-LHK ORDER OF DISMISSAL; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: AKERMAN SENTERFITT, LLP, TAYLOR L. BROADHEAD, AND JUSTIN D. BALSER; ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 OSC was also set for January 2, 2013 at 2:00 P.M. Id. The Court notified Plaintiffs that if 2 Plaintiffs failed to respond to the Aurora OSC and failed to appear at the January 2, 2013 hearing, 3 the Court would dismiss Plaintiffs’ case with prejudice as to Defendants Aurora Bank FSB, Aurora 4 Loan Services, LLC, and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. for failure to prosecute. 5 Id. 6 Plaintiffs failed to respond to either the Greenpoint OSC or the Aurora OSC. Plaintiffs also 7 failed to appear at the January 2, 2013 hearing on both OSC’s. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ case is 8 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendants Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., Aurora 9 Bank FSB, Aurora Loan Services, LLC, and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Defendant Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 7) is DENIED AS 11 MOOT. The February 28, 2013 hearing on the Aurora Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 12 11) is hereby VACATED. 13 Order to Show Cause 14 Furthermore, in light of Plaintiffs’ failure to respond to the Aurora Defendants’ motion to 15 dismiss, and failure to appear at the Aurora OSC hearing, the Court hereby orders Plaintiffs to 16 show cause why this case should not also be dismissed as to Defendants Akerman Senterfitt, LLP, 17 Taylor L. Broadhead, and Justin D. Balser (the Aurora Defendants who were inadvertently omitted 18 from the Aurora OSC). Plaintiffs have until January 16, 2013 to file a response to this Order to 19 Show Cause. A hearing on this Order to Show Cause is set for January 30, 2013 at 2:00 P.M. 20 Plaintiffs’ failure to respond to this Order and to appear at the January 30, 2013 hearing will result 21 in dismissal of Defendants Akerman Senterfitt, LLP, Taylor L. Broadhead, and Justin D. Balser 22 with prejudice for failure to prosecute. 23 Order Setting Case Management Conference 24 The initial case management conference scheduled for February 28, 2013 is hereby 25 ADVANCED to January 30, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. Plaintiffs are also advised that if Plaintiffs fail to 26 submit a joint case management conference statement in advance of the January 30, 2013 case 27 management conference and fail to appear at the January 30, 2013 case management conference, 28 3 Case No.: 12-CV-04636-LHK ORDER OF DISMISSAL; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: AKERMAN SENTERFITT, LLP, TAYLOR L. BROADHEAD, AND JUSTIN D. BALSER; ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 the Court will issue an order to show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed with 2 prejudice as to the remaining Defendants for failure to prosecute. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: January 3, 2013 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Case No.: 12-CV-04636-LHK ORDER OF DISMISSAL; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: AKERMAN SENTERFITT, LLP, TAYLOR L. BROADHEAD, AND JUSTIN D. BALSER; ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?