Morrice v. Rosewood et al
Filing
21
ORDER re 19 Continuing Initial Case Management Conference. Initial case management conference set for 9/11/2012, 1:30 PM. Related deadlines adjusted accordingly. Joint case management statement due by 9/4/2012. Any requests for further continuance must establish good cause and be filed no later than 9/4/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 7/23/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2012)
1
2
*E-FILED: July 23, 2012*
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
12
13
14
15
16
No. C12-01290 HRL
ANA CELESTE MORRICE, Ed.D.,
ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Plaintiff,
v.
HECATE ROSEWOOD; ALISAL UNION
SCHOOL DISTRICT; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
Defendants.
/
17
18
The parties’ request to continue the initial case management conference is granted. The
19
conference is continued to September 11, 2012, 1:30 p.m. All related deadlines are adjusted
20
accordingly. No later than September 4, 2012, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management
21
Statement. If the parties believe that a further continuance of the conference is warranted, they
22
shall, no later than September 4, 2012, file a request establishing good cause.
23
24
SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 23, 2012
25
HOWARD R. LLOYD
26
27
28
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
5:12-cv-01290-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
David Carl Anderson
3
Mark E. Davis
4
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
cynthia@dcandersonlaw.com, david@dcandersonlaw.com
mdavis@davisyounglaw.com, dmyers@davisyounglaw.com
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?