Morrice v. Rosewood et al

Filing 21

ORDER re 19 Continuing Initial Case Management Conference. Initial case management conference set for 9/11/2012, 1:30 PM. Related deadlines adjusted accordingly. Joint case management statement due by 9/4/2012. Any requests for further continuance must establish good cause and be filed no later than 9/4/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 7/23/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 *E-FILED: July 23, 2012* 3 4 5 6 NOT FOR CITATION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 7 12 13 14 15 16 No. C12-01290 HRL ANA CELESTE MORRICE, Ed.D., ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Plaintiff, v. HECATE ROSEWOOD; ALISAL UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. / 17 18 The parties’ request to continue the initial case management conference is granted. The 19 conference is continued to September 11, 2012, 1:30 p.m. All related deadlines are adjusted 20 accordingly. No later than September 4, 2012, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management 21 Statement. If the parties believe that a further continuance of the conference is warranted, they 22 shall, no later than September 4, 2012, file a request establishing good cause. 23 24 SO ORDERED. Dated: July 23, 2012 25 HOWARD R. LLOYD 26 27 28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 5:12-cv-01290-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 David Carl Anderson 3 Mark E. Davis 4 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. cynthia@dcandersonlaw.com, david@dcandersonlaw.com mdavis@davisyounglaw.com, dmyers@davisyounglaw.com 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?