Adema Technologies, Inc v. Imaginit Solar Building Products, LLC
Filing
24
REQUEST OF PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE WITH ORDER, granting re 23 Proposed Order, filed by Adema Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 6/11/2012. (ofrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
JEFFREY A. SNYDER (CA Bar No. 148217)
jeff@shumansnyder.com
ERIN L. McDERMIT (CA Bar No. 241167)
erin@shumansnyder.com
SHUMAN SNYDER LLP
525 Middlefield Road, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel: 650.443.5100
Fax: 650.644.3348
DAVID J. SHLANSKY* (MA BBO No. 565321)
David.Shlansky@slglawfirm.com
SHLANSKY LAW GROUP, LLP
303 Wyman Street, Suite 300
Waltham, MA 02451
Phone: (617) 497-7200
Fax: (866) 257-9530
10
11
12
13
* Admitted pro hac vice
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ADEMA Technologies, Inc.,
doing business as Gloria Solar (USA)
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN JOSE DIVISION
17
ADEMA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
D/B/A GLORIA SOLAR (USA),
CASE NO. C-12-01366 PSG
18
Plaintiff and
Counterclaim Defendant,
19
v.
20
21
22
IMAGINIT SOLAR BUILDING
PRODUCTS, LLC, D/B/A
SOLARFRAMEWORKS,
23
Defendant and
Counterclaim Plaintiff.
24
25
///
27
Date: June 12, 2012
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Courtroom: 5
///
26
REQUEST OF
PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIM
DEFENDANT’S COUNSEL PRO HAC
VICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE,
WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER
///
28
S HUMAN S NYDER
LLP
-1REQUEST OF PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT’S COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE TO APPEAR BY
TELEPHONE, WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
TO ALL PARTIES HEREIN AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
2
Please take notice that Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant’s counsel pro hac vice, David J.
3
Shlansky, who maintains his office in Waltham, Massachusetts, requests permission of this Court
4
to appear by telephone at the Case Management Conference scheduled for the above-mentioned
5
date and time.
6
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant’s counsel understand that per Civil L.R. 16-10 this
7
request should be submitted 7 days before the Case Management Conference, but there was some
8
confusion as to the correct date of the Case Management Conference due to the Court producing
9
two separate orders with two different Case Management Conference dates. In an abundance of
10
caution, we have filed all of the necessary papers under the assumption that the Case
11
Management Conference could be held on June 12 th, but we thought the Case Management
12
Conference would actually be held on June 19th. With Attorney David Shlansky located in
13
Massachusetts and Attorney David Palladino located in Colorado, allowing Attorneys Shlansky
14
and Palladino to participate in tomorrow’s Case Management Conference via telephone will
15
likely allow for a most productive Case Management Conference that will benefit the Court.
16
17
Date: June 11, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
18
/s/ Erin L. McDermit
ERIN L. MCDERMIT
JEFFREY A. SNYDER
DAVID J. SHLANSKY*
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim Defendant ADEMA
Technologies, Inc., d/b/a Gloria Solar (USA)
19
20
21
22
23
* Admitted pro hac vice
24
25
26
27
28
S HUMAN S NYDER
LLP
-2REQUEST OF PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT’S COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE TO APPEAR BY
TELEPHONE, WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
ORDER
2
3
Having considered the request of Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant’s counsel pro hac vice
to appear by telephone at the Case Management Conference scheduled for June 12, 2012, and
4
good cause appearing therefore,
5
IT HEREBY IS ORDERED that the requested permission is granted.
6
7
8
________________________________
PAUL SINGH GREWAL
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Dated:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
S HUMAN S NYDER
LLP
-3REQUEST OF PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT’S COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE TO APPEAR BY
TELEPHONE, WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?